Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso - UFMT vs Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich - LMU vs University of Mkar - UMM vs Istituto Marangoni vs Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Kakinada - JNTUK
Side-by-side comparison from 82 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Highly qualified and supportive faculty
- +Excellent infrastructure and resources, including a well-equipped hospital
- +Engaging and challenging academic programs with career-boosting opportunities
- +Strong academic programs with high-quality teaching and practical experience
- +Valuable international environment and diverse study options
- +Excellent value with zero tuition fees and research opportunities
- +Supportive and disciplined academic environment
- +Values-driven education focus
- +Global fashion hub and career opportunities
- +Inspiring teachers and valuable learning experiences
- +Strong academics and quality education
- +Supportive faculty and environment
- +Good career opportunities and skill development
- +International environment and diverse cultures
- +Practical, hands-on learning and industry connections
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
Nothing to show
- -Poor infrastructure and lack of research support.
- -Unclear career path guidance.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of course relevance are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Communication breakdowns and lack of transparency are significant problems.
- -Poor faculty quality and blatant partiality.
- -Inconsistent and unfair paper valuation.
- -Poor staff attitude and a lack of care for students are significant issues.
- -Unfulfilled promises and misleading information create a negative student experience.
- -Inadequate facilities and miserable conditions contribute to dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
Academics and campus experience are key strengths, with **Professors** and **Location** both scoring an excellent 4.6. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** also received solid ratings of 4 and 4.2 respectively. The university's **Internationality** stands out as its weakest area, receiving a 3.4, while **Student Life** is rated moderately at 3.8. Overall, the university offers good **Value** at 4.2.
This university garners strong feedback across most aspects. Its highest-rated category is Facilities, closely followed by Value and Internationality. Student Life also receives positive scores. The area with the lowest rating, though still respectable, is Accomodation. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and appealing environment for its students.
This institution excels in **Location** and **Value**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, **Student Life** is a significant area for improvement, scoring a zero. Other aspects, including **Accomodation** and **Professors**, are rated moderately at 3. **Facilities** and **Internationality** received lower scores of 2, suggesting these could also benefit from development.
This institution shines particularly brightly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving excellent scores. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out as strong points. Conversely, the **Facilities** represent the weakest area, scoring considerably lower than other aspects. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement but also solid performance.
The university performs strongly across multiple areas, with student life receiving the highest rating. Facilities and accommodation are also well-regarded. Value for money is a notable positive, alongside a good score for location. Internationality presents as the weakest area, though it still maintains a respectable rating. Professors are also rated favorably.
This institution receives its highest marks for Location, with a perfect score. Student Life and Internationality are also strong areas, both scoring above 4.0. Conversely, Value for Money is the lowest-rated aspect, followed by Facilities and Professors, which also received moderate scores. Accommodations fall in the middle range of ratings.
Nothing to show
University reviews are largely positive (~83%), praising exceptional faculty, good campus infrastructure, and career-boosting programs. A small percentage of feedback (~17%) notes issues with research environment and career paths.
Nearly all of the 48 reviews are positive, reflecting a high average rating of 4.06/5. Students praise academic quality, practical project experience, international environment, and program flexibility. No negative reviews were submitted.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. It highlights a peaceful, faith-based environment, supportive lecturers, and good academic growth. No negative feedback was received.
With a 3.67 average rating, positive feedback (~33%) highlights fashion business opportunities and inspiring teachers. No negative reviews were provided.
With an average rating of 4.07/5, ~86% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, faculty support, and good career opportunities. A small ~7% of feedback mentions issues with faculty and paper valuation in specific departments.
About 78% of reviews are positive, highlighting the international environment, practical approach, industry connections, and supportive lecturers. Two reviews (about 22%) express dissatisfaction with staff rudeness and perceived broken promises.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
There are superior facilities at the FH Aachen. The tutorial halls and classes are sophisticated, equipped with the the current and innovative equipment, and the library is large and well-stocked. To guarantee that students have a positive college experience, the educational facility also offers a range of extracurricular activities and events.
Nothing to show
I like a lot of it but I feel like the subject teaches us the same every time. There should be more diversity in our contents and make us work more in groups and do more exercises in class, in order words the classes should be more dynamic
Nothing to show
To be honest compared to other universities BHMS did not strike me as a great choice in the first place. However, the 2 semesters per year, where in the first one you study and in the second one you do an internship is a really great way of learning. I have gotten great opportunities and met many people here. I would like to highlight my professor; Mr. Marcel Enzler. He is an amazing lecturer who truly believes in his students and also tries to elevate the school to the best of his abilities. After doing my studies here for 3 years, I would like to see them make the first and second year curriculum fit the industry requirements and standards. Because they are very easy courses and once you are in third year you start struggling a lot. Other than that I immensely enjoyed my time here.
Nothing to show
