Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs Eindhoven University of Technology - TU/e vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Wittenborg University of Applied Sciences vs NHL Stenden University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 355 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and supportive professors
- +Diverse and international student environment
- +Balanced theory and practical application in programmes
- +Innovative, problem-solving engineering focus
- +Dedicated, knowledgeable, and supportive lecturers
- +Engaging learning, personal development, and strong community
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Practical, industry-focused curriculum with entrepreneurship and FinTech emphasis
- +Supportive, international, and diverse academic environment
- +Engaging and approachable professors and mentors
- +Practical, hands-on learning with real-world projects
- +Welcoming atmosphere and strong sense of community
- +Ample opportunities for personal growth and industry immersion
- +Supportive and dedicated faculty
- +Practical learning and valuable experience
- +Good facilities and balanced student life
- +Great teachers and supportive staff
- +Excellent facilities and modern buildings
- +Strong sense of community and opportunities for engagement
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Unclear communication and lack of support create a negative experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -Inflexible and unengaging course content fails to meet student needs.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Poor communication and lack of teacher availability lead to students feeling unsupported and left to self-teach.
- -Widespread disorganization and unclear assignments create confusion and hinder academic progress.
- -Inconsistent feedback, or a complete lack thereof, makes it difficult for students to understand their performance and areas for improvement.
- -Poor quality of teaching and instructors' lack of relevant work experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Facilities and resources are often described as outdated or insufficient.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring concern.
This university demonstrates strong performance, particularly in its **Internationality**, earning a rating of 4.46. Professors are also highly regarded at 4.31, alongside a positive showing for Location and Value. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.15.
This institution garners strong approval for its facilities and location, both scoring above 4.5. Professors and internationality also receive positive marks, exceeding 4.2. Student life ratings are solid at nearly 4.0. The weakest areas appear to be accommodation, with a score of 3.5, and value, which is rated at 4.35.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
A notable strength lies in the university's **Internationality**, achieving a high rating of 4.875. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest score at 2.625, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other areas, including Accommodation, Location, Value, and Professors, fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded offering with specific areas of excellence and those needing development.
This institution scores exceptionally well in Facilities and Internationality, indicating a robust environment for students and a global outlook. Student Life and Location also receive strong marks. Conversely, the areas of Professors and Accomodation present the weakest performance, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects. Value for money is rated reasonably well.
This institution receives excellent marks for its facilities and value, both scoring close to a perfect 4. The teaching staff are also highly rated. Areas that received slightly lower, though still respectable, scores include location, student life, and internationality. Accommodation received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects.
This university garners high marks across several key areas, with Facilities standing out as a particular strength, scoring 4.53. Student Life also receives strong approval at 4.44. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, rating 3.81. Other notable scores include Professors (4.13), Location (4.29), Internationality (4.13), and Value (4.31).
With a high average rating of 4.3/5 from 56 reviews, ~89% of students praise the university's multicultural environment, excellent library resources, and dedicated professors. There are no 1-2 star reviews.
With ~93% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.35/5, students praise the university's focus on engineering, innovation, and real-world problem-solving. They highlight engaging courses, dedicated lecturers, and a supportive academic environment.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
Most feedback is positive (~74%), highlighting practical learning, entrepreneurship focus, and internationalism. There are no negative reviews in the provided data.
Approximately 94% of reviews are positive, praising practical learning, opportunities, and a welcoming atmosphere. About 6% of reviews mention disorganization, poor communication, and lack of support.
Approximately 80% of reviews are positive, praising helpful professors, good facilities, and a positive learning atmosphere. One review, ~10% of feedback, expressed dissatisfaction with teaching quality for international students. The average rating is 3.9/5.
With a 4.28 average rating from 47 reviews, ~98% of students are positive, highlighting excellent facilities, supportive staff, and enjoyable learning experiences. There is virtually no negative feedback.
As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.
My experience within TU/e is overall positive mainly due to the student focused approach that the university utilises in order to accomodate new students and make them feel at home. One of the ways this was achieved was by having a vast variety of student associations for absolutely every hobby that one might have. On top of that, the university promotes and encourages the participation within student teams which is a perfect bridge between studying and working as you get to experience how a real work environment functions while being surrounded by students. The university also provides different levels of guidance so that one can tackle any problem they face.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Studying Creative Business at NHL Stenden has been a great experience with a few bumps down the road. Generally speaking, I'm very glad about my choice to study here - as an international student I am surrounded by other internationals which makes me feel more welcome and comfortable; this university has provided me with numerous extracurricular opportunities, which were not only great for networking and finding like-minded connections, but also getting extremely nice and useful experience, whether it's working on a real set with professional production equipment or creating content and representing my course on social media! When it comes to the study itself, it usually is pretty confusing, as students are usually just thrown into practical projects without initial preparation and sometimes not enough guidance. However, once you get used to design-based education, you realize how exciting the assignments actually are - working with real clients, producing your own ideas and seeing them come to life, and just "creativity, creativity, creativity" everywhere. I recommend this university for those who are not afraid of teamwork, thinking outside of the box, and being independent.
The lesson materials we are receiving are quite interesting in regards to the course. We are learning about global issues and how to handle encountering different cultures as international social workers.
In my opinion this is the best choice I made in terms of my career. Ive met a lot of great people and made so many new friends, the facilities at this school are also really great, the classes are most of the time really great.
