Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs Delft University of Technology - TU Delft vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Wittenborg University of Applied Sciences vs HAN University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 260 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Balanced theory/practice with real-world application
- +Diverse and international student community and faculty
- +High-quality, challenging education with expert guest lectures
- +Engineering focus and advanced technical content
- +Practical learning approach and creative expression
- +Supportive community and inspiring peers/lecturers
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
- +Academic and personal growth opportunities
- +Diverse student community and good facilities
- +Practical, industry-focused curriculum with entrepreneurship and FinTech emphasis
- +Supportive, international, and diverse academic environment
- +Engaging and approachable professors and mentors
- +Practical, industry-relevant learning with engaged, experienced staff.
- +Excellent facilities and a supportive, high-quality educational environment.
- +Balanced student life opportunities with an international atmosphere.
- +Excellent teachers and supportive staff
- +Engaging courses and flexible academic paths
- +Great facilities and friendly atmosphere
- +Flexible online learning model
- +Academic rigor and intellectual challenge
- +Supportive faculty and administration
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Poor communication and lack of support negatively impact the student experience.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of pedagogical understanding.
- -Unhelpful and pushy academic and administrative staff.
- -Students feel ignored and not supported in their learning.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of communication and transparency is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities are a recurring complaint.
- -Unresponsive or unhelpful staff contribute to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is often irrelevant and not engaging.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum lead to poor educational outcomes.
This institution shows a strong performance in key areas, with Internationality (4.26) and Value (4.19) receiving the highest marks. Professors (4.13) also earned a notably positive rating. Student Life (3.98) and Location (3.96) are also well-regarded. The weakest area, however, is Accomodation, which received a considerably lower score of 3.11.
This institution garners impressive scores in several key areas, with Facilities and Internationality standing out as particularly strong at over 4.4. Location and Value also receive high marks, reflecting positively on the student experience. Conversely, Accomodation presents a significant area for improvement, scoring considerably lower than other categories. Student Life, while decent, also falls slightly behind the higher-rated aspects.
A robust profile emerges, with exceptional marks for its professors, location, and student life. The university also scores well in internationality and value. Conversely, facilities and accommodation received slightly lower, though still positive, ratings, representing the areas with the most room for improvement.
A notable strength lies in the university's **Internationality**, achieving a high rating of 4.875. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest score at 2.625, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other areas, including Accommodation, Location, Value, and Professors, fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded offering with specific areas of excellence and those needing development.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors**, receiving a high rating of 4.43. Facilities and value are also highly regarded, both scoring 4.29. Conversely, the university's **location** and **accommodation** received the lowest marks at 3.86, suggesting these areas may warrant further attention for improvement. Student life and internationality are rated moderately well, with scores of 4.00 and 4.14 respectively.
This institution garners strong acclaim in several areas, with facilities standing out at an impressive 4.75. Student life and location also receive high marks, both above 4.5. Conversely, accommodation presents the lowest score at 4.03, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other aspects like professors, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-range.
An analysis of the university's ratings reveals a stark contrast between its strengths and weaknesses. The institution excels in **Value** (4.84), **Professors** (4.68), and **Internationality** (4.68). Conversely, **Location** (1.89), **Accomodation** (1.95), and **Student Life** (2.05) received significantly lower scores, indicating areas that may require improvement. Facilities are rated moderately at 2.74.
~93% of 51 reviews are positive, highlighting good theory-practice balance, knowledgeable lecturers, and program flexibility. No negative feedback was recorded.
The university receives strong positive feedback, with ~90% of reviews praising learning materials, practical approaches, and supportive communities. A small minority (~3%) express concerns about specific program content and pedagogical approaches.
With an average rating of 4.74/5 from 19 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students praise supportive and knowledgeable lecturers, helpful academic support, good facilities, and a diverse community. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
Most feedback is positive (~74%), highlighting practical learning, entrepreneurship focus, and internationalism. There are no negative reviews in the provided data.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with ~88% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars and an average of 4.25/5. Recurring themes include excellent facilities, supportive staff, and effective practical teaching. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
Over 98% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent facilities, supportive staff, and engaging coursework. Students frequently mention making new friends and a motivating learning environment. No negative feedback was reported.
Nearly all reviews are positive, with students praising academic rigor, challenging coursework, and flexible online learning. Supervisors and the platform are also frequently highlighted as supportive and effective.
As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.
Hello, [Skip to "Conclusion" for a brief summary] In this post, I’ll share my experience with the TU Delft Industrial Design Engineering bachelor's program as a graduate, so that future students can make a more informed decision. I chose this bachelor’s program because I expected it to involve a lot of engineering and technical content, which would help me understand how most products are made, think production techniques, appropriate material use, product manufacturing, and the integration of technology and mathematics that’s common in modern products. However, I ended up learning very little about these topics during my time in the program. The study mainly consisted of filling out Miro (an online platform) templates, coming up with systems, and focusing on sustainability (which, to be fair, isn't necessarily a bad thing). But I never felt like I was learning anything new; I was just repeatedly filling in the same kinds of templates for the DP/PO (Design Project/Project Organisatie) courses throughout the full three years. Each year, you follow two DP/PO courses. The only courses I personally found useful in terms of learning product design were the drawing classes and a first-year SolidWorks course (3D modeling). Normally, I find math courses boring and difficult, but thanks to this bachelor’s, I actually really enjoyed the two math/physics courses (Product Dynamics and Product Statics). For the first time in a while, I felt like I was doing something meaningful, had to put in effort, and was actually learning something new. Another thing I really disliked about this program is how “school-like” it’s structured. You're required to be on campus every day from 8:45 AM to 5:30 PM, working in a so-called “studio” (classroom) with your fellow students, supposedly to learn from each other. This might work for some people, but for me (and I think for others too), it didn’t. I can’t focus well in noisy, crowded spaces, and I rarely connected with my fellow students. The social atmosphere was always centered around the typical student lifestyle (like student associations), and I wasn’t involved in that kind of life at all. The strict scheduling was probably the worst part. It made me feel like I was still in high school, instead of being a responsible adult who should be allowed to structure their own time. In many courses, you’re also penalized if you’re absent or not actively participating in class. Your final grade often drops as a result, especially since there’s always a rubric item about “communication and presence” of the student. Now on to a very different, but important point I want to share. I’m a guy with a Turkish background/ethnicity. This has, in my experience, had a significant impact on how I was treated and assessed during my studies. Because of my appearance, I stood out a lot in this predominantly Dutch/white bachelor’s program. I was one of the very few students with a migration background (I could count them on one hand, out of 300+ students in my year). In group projects and reports, I often felt like I wasn’t taken seriously by the lecturers. I never really felt welcome at the faculty or in the studios, I often felt like an outsider. The assessments for reports/projects were always subjective. Yes, there’s a so-called “rubric,” but it’s completely vague and can be interpreted in many ways, so you never know whether you’ve actually met the expectations. In my opinion, grading was purely based on the teacher’s personal opinion, and this was even confirmed by one of the teachers, who admitted the rubrics were “kind of nonsense” and that they just decide the grade based on how they feel about you and your work. As a result, I rarely received high marks for assignments, even though I consistently scored 8s on exams, which are graded objectively. I even went to the study advisor once because I had been unfairly graded. But even the study advisor couldn’t care less. He flat-out said “NO” to my face when I expressed my concerns emotionally. I didn’t even get a fake “that’s unfortunate” or a polite smile. That showed me that basic empathy is not standard for everyone. In my view, these are the bare minimum responses you’d expect when a student is struggling. That’s why I want to clearly state in this post that, in my experience, there’s a significant amount of racism within the IDE bachelor’s program at TU Delft. You might be wondering, after reading all this, “Why didn’t you just quit the program?” I started this program during the COVID outbreak, which meant my entire first year was online (with mandatory Zoom attendance from 8:45 AM to 5:30 PM). So at first, I thought my negative experience was due to the pandemic. When I finally got to campus in my second year, I realized too late that this program just wasn’t the right fit for me. But I’m someone who always sees things through and doesn’t quit halfway. Since I had already completed more than a year, I was determined to finish. Conclusion All in all, I strongly advise against choosing this bachelor’s program if your goal is to pursue a real engineering-focused, challenging, and educational degree, because IDE at TU Delft is certainly not that. To future students with a migrant background: only consider this program if you’re planning to do it with a friend. You’re unlikely to make many friends here, and you’ll probably end up feeling lonely and like an outsider, especially if your values or cultural background differ from the average “IDE” student. I’m now studying something else at a different university, and I’m much happier. I’m achieving great results and feel appreciated. Just to be clear: my review is not about TU Delft as a whole, it is specifically about the Industrial Design Engineering bachelor’s program. If you have any questions after reading my “mini-book,” feel free to send me a private message on Reddit or leave a comment under this post. I’m happy to help you make a better-informed study decision, something I, unfortunately, didn’t have.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The lesson materials we are receiving are quite interesting in regards to the course. We are learning about global issues and how to handle encountering different cultures as international social workers.
My experience with the university is going pretty well for now. In terms of education, I can say that they have thought about everything. The program is structured in such way that the study load never gets to be too much. You get to work with different kinds of materials, therefore, practice different skills. Also, it is very career-oriented - you can see how everything you learn will help you in the future. Another positive thing is that if you experience any challenges in your personal or education plan, there is always someone you can contact and get help or advice. Here, you can find the balance between social and student life. The environment is very international, as well. Basically, it gives a wonderful opportunity to grow in the professional plan, but also make connections. However, there is something that you should consider if you are planning to apply here, or anywhere in the Netherlands - the shortage of accommodation. The university provides rooms for first-year students, but after that, it is quite hard to get one on your own. If you are looking for a place, where you get excellent education without having to give up on your social life, I would definitely recommend it.
I am a PhD student at Global Humanistic University. I chose GHU because of its flexible and balanced learning model of online education. With the busy schedules of my entrepreneurial journey, GHU has offered me an effective education model which aligns with my aspiration of right balance between professional work, education, and family. My supervisor and the administration team are effective in their communication which makes learning and coordination hustle free. I recommend GHU for professionals who desire to enhance their education.
