University of Groningen - RUG vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Wittenborg University of Applied Sciences vs Hanze University of Applied Sciences - UAS vs Global Humanistic University - GHU
Side-by-side comparison from 173 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality faculty and innovative teaching
- +State-of-the-art facilities and extensive campus amenities
- +International atmosphere and opportunities for self-development
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Well-organized courses and learning resources
- +Personal and academic development
- +Practical, industry-focused curriculum with entrepreneurship and FinTech emphasis
- +Supportive, international, and diverse academic environment
- +Engaging and approachable professors and mentors
- +Practical, skills-based learning with interconnected subjects
- +Helpful, inspiring, and approachable teachers
- +International atmosphere and opportunities for collaboration
- +Flexible online learning model
- +Academic rigor and intellectual challenge
- +Supportive faculty and administration
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Lack of support and high failure rates create a negative academic environment.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues contribute to confusion and frustration.
- -Toxic culture and discrimination negatively impact student well-being and integration.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Unprofessional and informal handling of student concerns.
- -Outdated curriculum and low teacher commitment.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum lead to poor educational outcomes.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.28) and **Student Life** (4.21). **Facilities** (4.15) and **Location** (4.07) also receive strong scores. The primary area for improvement lies in **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating (2.90). **Professors** (3.84) and **Value** (4.02) are rated moderately.
Overall, this institution garners favorable reviews across multiple aspects. The highest-rated areas are Professors (4.75) and Location (4.73), indicating significant strengths in these domains. Conversely, Facilities (4.3) and Accomodation (4.27) received the lowest scores, suggesting these might be areas for potential improvement. Student Life and Internationality also scored highly.
A notable strength lies in the university's **Internationality**, achieving a high rating of 4.875. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest score at 2.625, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other areas, including Accommodation, Location, Value, and Professors, fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded offering with specific areas of excellence and those needing development.
This university garners its highest marks for **Internationality** (4.44) and **Student Life** (4.38), indicating a vibrant and globally-connected campus experience. **Location** also scores well at 4.18. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area with a rating of 3.07. **Professors** received a moderate 3.67, while **Facilities** and **Value** landed in the upper-threes.
An analysis of the university's ratings reveals a stark contrast between its strengths and weaknesses. The institution excels in **Value** (4.84), **Professors** (4.68), and **Internationality** (4.68). Conversely, **Location** (1.89), **Accomodation** (1.95), and **Student Life** (2.05) received significantly lower scores, indicating areas that may require improvement. Facilities are rated moderately at 2.74.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
~72% of reviews are positive, highlighting quality faculty, state-of-the-art facilities, and an international atmosphere. ~11% of feedback is negative, mentioning issues with academic support and student care.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), highlighting excellent teaching, supportive staff, and well-organized courses that improve language and academic skills. Minor scheduling changes were the only noted inconvenience.
Most feedback is positive (~74%), highlighting practical learning, entrepreneurship focus, and internationalism. There are no negative reviews in the provided data.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting helpful teachers, practical learning, and an international atmosphere. A small minority (~6%) found the environment unprofessional.
Nearly all reviews are positive, with students praising academic rigor, challenging coursework, and flexible online learning. Supervisors and the platform are also frequently highlighted as supportive and effective.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Not to use harsh words but Dutch culture is extremely toxic towards people who do not resemble their look and do not conform to their culture The school is extremely arrogant and disrespectful to people and caused me severe mental health stress and social isolation I believe such school is never place for exchanging knowledge or anything in fact the school bullying, and stereotypes towards autism on top of their staggering level of racism is insane. If you complaint about the racism of the people there, they will never take you seriously or initiate investigations One of the most regretful incidents of my life has been chosen to come to this school and that I regret very much If you’re of East Asian background, unless you have very good resistance to Dutch people’s “jokes” and passive aggression, I will almost certainly hope you never attend this school. Student Number s5884284
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I followed the Marketing & Communications Bachelor at Hanzehogeschool and the course has taught me very little with regards to what is actually required in the marketing field. To start off, 90% of the teachers do lectures as a side job, very low commitment from most of them I spent a full year learning and applying marketing theories that were branded outdated in the 90's and early 2000's. In addition a whole semester was wasted on a theory one of the teachers came up with. The professor who guided my while writing my thesis laughed at the premise of using it. Current and future marketing is mostly based on digital marketing. The """"professor"""" digital marketing knew squat, zero. In the digital marketing field, aspects such as SEO, SEA, Google AdWords etc are vital. This was not taught properly in the curriculum. A fellow student who had a side job working with AdWords stopped showing up, as he claimed the teacher was explaining it wrong. If you want to get into marketing, go somewhere else. Hanze will teach how to do a SWOT analysis (debunked in the 90's) every year you attend and not teach you the skills vital in a new marketing environment. I do not work in marketing or advertising, I feel and know I do not possess the necessary skills from merely reading the job vacancy. I finished the degree to make sure I have a Bachelor standard and not completely waste my time and money.
I am a PhD student at Global Humanistic University. I chose GHU because of its flexible and balanced learning model of online education. With the busy schedules of my entrepreneurial journey, GHU has offered me an effective education model which aligns with my aspiration of right balance between professional work, education, and family. My supervisor and the administration team are effective in their communication which makes learning and coordination hustle free. I recommend GHU for professionals who desire to enhance their education.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
