University of Groningen - RUG vs Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Wittenborg University of Applied Sciences vs Hanze University of Applied Sciences - UAS
Side-by-side comparison from 219 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, innovative education and renowned faculty
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +International atmosphere and self-development opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and student life
- +Strong academic programs with practical application
- +Opportunities for personal growth and specialization
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Practical, industry-focused curriculum with entrepreneurship and FinTech emphasis
- +Supportive, international, and diverse academic environment
- +Engaging and approachable professors and mentors
- +Practical, hands-on learning approach
- +Helpful and supportive teachers
- +International atmosphere and diverse peer groups
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Lack of academic and administrative support, with uncaring professors and high failure rates.
- -Negative and exclusionary cultural environment, including racism, bullying, and stereotypes.
- -Poor communication and confusing academic processes that do not accommodate students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are disappointing.
- -Course content and teaching quality are inconsistent.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -unprofessional and hostile environment with informal and inappropriate handling of concerns
- -outdated curriculum and lack of practical relevance to the field
- -low commitment from part-time teachers
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Internationality stands out as its strongest point, with a very high rating. Student life and facilities also receive strong scores, reflecting positive campus experiences. However, accommodation emerges as a significant weakness, with a notably lower rating compared to other aspects. Professors and value are rated competently, while location is also a solid performer.
This university demonstrates a well-rounded profile, with exceptionally high ratings for **Internationality** (4.28) and **Professors** (4.12). Students also seem to appreciate the **Student Life** (3.98) and **Value** (4.18). Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest score (3.12), indicating an area for potential improvement. **Facilities** also scored moderately lower (3.76).
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
A notable strength lies in the university's **Internationality**, achieving a high rating of 4.875. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest score at 2.625, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other areas, including Accommodation, Location, Value, and Professors, fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded offering with specific areas of excellence and those needing development.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in **Student Life** and **Internationality**, both scoring highly at 4.4. **Location** also received a strong rating of 4.2. Conversely, **Accommodations** emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.1. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, and Value fall within a moderate to good range.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
~74% of reviews are positive, praising high-quality faculty, state-of-the-art facilities, and innovative teaching. ~12% of reviews express concerns about lack of support and difficult academics.
Vast majority (~100%) of reviews are positive, praising the multicultural environment and valuable opportunities like study abroad and guest lectures. Educational quality and practical application are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was recorded.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
Most feedback is positive (~74%), highlighting practical learning, entrepreneurship focus, and internationalism. There are no negative reviews in the provided data.
With ~74% of reviews being positive, students appreciate the international atmosphere, helpful teachers, and practical learning approach. A small portion (~5.7%) of negative feedback mentioned unprofessional environments and outdated curriculum.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Not to use harsh words but Dutch culture is extremely toxic towards people who do not resemble their look and do not conform to their culture The school is extremely arrogant and disrespectful to people and caused me severe mental health stress and social isolation I believe such school is never place for exchanging knowledge or anything in fact the school bullying, and stereotypes towards autism on top of their staggering level of racism is insane. If you complaint about the racism of the people there, they will never take you seriously or initiate investigations One of the most regretful incidents of my life has been chosen to come to this school and that I regret very much If you’re of East Asian background, unless you have very good resistance to Dutch people’s “jokes” and passive aggression, I will almost certainly hope you never attend this school. Student Number s5884284
As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I followed the Marketing & Communications Bachelor at Hanzehogeschool and the course has taught me very little with regards to what is actually required in the marketing field. To start off, 90% of the teachers do lectures as a side job, very low commitment from most of them I spent a full year learning and applying marketing theories that were branded outdated in the 90's and early 2000's. In addition a whole semester was wasted on a theory one of the teachers came up with. The professor who guided my while writing my thesis laughed at the premise of using it. Current and future marketing is mostly based on digital marketing. The """"professor"""" digital marketing knew squat, zero. In the digital marketing field, aspects such as SEO, SEA, Google AdWords etc are vital. This was not taught properly in the curriculum. A fellow student who had a side job working with AdWords stopped showing up, as he claimed the teacher was explaining it wrong. If you want to get into marketing, go somewhere else. Hanze will teach how to do a SWOT analysis (debunked in the 90's) every year you attend and not teach you the skills vital in a new marketing environment. I do not work in marketing or advertising, I feel and know I do not possess the necessary skills from merely reading the job vacancy. I finished the degree to make sure I have a Bachelor standard and not completely waste my time and money.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
