Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Wittenborg University of Applied Sciences vs Breda University of Applied Sciences vs NHL Stenden University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 242 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and supportive professors
- +Diverse and international student environment
- +Balanced theory and practical application in programmes
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Practical, industry-focused curriculum with entrepreneurship and FinTech emphasis
- +Supportive, international, and diverse academic environment
- +Engaging and approachable professors and mentors
- +Strong industry-relevant skill development and career preparation.
- +Supportive and professional faculty guidance.
- +Opportunities for creativity and broad learning.
- +Practical, hands-on learning with real-world projects
- +Welcoming atmosphere and strong sense of community
- +Ample opportunities for personal growth and industry immersion
- +Holistic learning approach
- +Positive overall experience
- +Strong recommendation
- +Internship and study abroad opportunities
- +Strong career prospects and networking
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Unclear communication and lack of support create a negative experience.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear career relevance and transferability of skills.
- -Programmatic issues, including misleading international focus and language barriers.
- -Poor communication and lack of teacher availability lead to students feeling unsupported and left to self-teach.
- -Widespread disorganization and unclear assignments create confusion and hinder academic progress.
- -Inconsistent feedback, or a complete lack thereof, makes it difficult for students to understand their performance and areas for improvement.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Ineffective teaching and unsupportive instructors.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor learning resources are frequently criticized.
- -A lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring complaint.
This university demonstrates strong performance, particularly in its **Internationality**, earning a rating of 4.46. Professors are also highly regarded at 4.31, alongside a positive showing for Location and Value. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.15.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
A notable strength lies in the university's **Internationality**, achieving a high rating of 4.875. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest score at 2.625, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other areas, including Accommodation, Location, Value, and Professors, fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded offering with specific areas of excellence and those needing development.
Analyzing the provided ratings, the university demonstrates its strongest performance in Location, receiving a perfect score. Facilities also fare well, with a rating of 3.86. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring a low 2.14. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, and Value fall within a moderate range, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This institution scores exceptionally well in Facilities and Internationality, indicating a robust environment for students and a global outlook. Student Life and Location also receive strong marks. Conversely, the areas of Professors and Accomodation present the weakest performance, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects. Value for money is rated reasonably well.
This institution receives top marks in key areas, including its professors, international outlook, and overall value. Conversely, it scores zero in facilities, location, student life, and accommodation. These extreme ratings suggest a university that excels in academic and global aspects, but has significant shortcomings in its physical campus and student experience offerings.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its vibrant student life, earning a perfect score, and its convenient location, which is rated highly at 4.5. Conversely, areas requiring attention include the quality of professors and accommodation, both receiving a middle-of-the-road 3. Facilities and internationality also fall into this moderate range. The overall value proposition sits at a respectable 3.5.
With a high average rating of 4.3/5 from 56 reviews, ~89% of students praise the university's multicultural environment, excellent library resources, and dedicated professors. There are no 1-2 star reviews.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
Most feedback is positive (~74%), highlighting practical learning, entrepreneurship focus, and internationalism. There are no negative reviews in the provided data.
Around 57% of reviews are positive, highlighting skill development and professional support. However, about 29% of feedback points to program content not meeting expectations and limited career preparation.
Approximately 94% of reviews are positive, praising practical learning, opportunities, and a welcoming atmosphere. About 6% of reviews mention disorganization, poor communication, and lack of support.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students praise the learning experience and highly recommend the university.
With a 3.5/5 average rating, this university receives positive feedback (~100% of reviews) highlighting program length, internship opportunities, study abroad options, and strong career prospects. No negative feedback was provided.
As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Very flexible in what you can choose, but the course can be very vague and push you into the marketing or film track. Other specializations don't get as many options for the graduation project. There are also some very passionate and good teachers at the school, but sometimes classes don't really follow with what you need to know for the deliverable
Studying Creative Business at NHL Stenden has been a great experience with a few bumps down the road. Generally speaking, I'm very glad about my choice to study here - as an international student I am surrounded by other internationals which makes me feel more welcome and comfortable; this university has provided me with numerous extracurricular opportunities, which were not only great for networking and finding like-minded connections, but also getting extremely nice and useful experience, whether it's working on a real set with professional production equipment or creating content and representing my course on social media! When it comes to the study itself, it usually is pretty confusing, as students are usually just thrown into practical projects without initial preparation and sometimes not enough guidance. However, once you get used to design-based education, you realize how exciting the assignments actually are - working with real clients, producing your own ideas and seeing them come to life, and just "creativity, creativity, creativity" everywhere. I recommend this university for those who are not afraid of teamwork, thinking outside of the box, and being independent.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
