London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Bangor University vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Cardiff University vs Centre for Alternative Technology

Side-by-side comparison from 628 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Bloomsbury Institute London (5.00)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 2/7 categories
Bangor University: wins 0/7 categories
EM Normandie - EM Normandie: wins 0/7 categories
Cardiff University: wins 2/7 categories
Centre for Alternative Technology: wins 0/7 categories
Bloomsbury Institute London: wins 2/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Wales, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
71 reviews
×
Best programme: Biochemistry
Best programme: MSc International Logistics and Port Management
Cardiff, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
217 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Wales, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
London, The United Kingdom
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Science
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
4.40
4.00
4.56
Win
Not rated
4.50
4.56
Location
4.78
Win
4.55
3.57
4.66
Not rated
4.00
4.78
Professors
4.26
4.41
4.00
4.48
Not rated
4.00
4.67
Win
Internationality
4.80
Win
4.44
4.14
4.48
Not rated
4.00
4.67
Student life
3.63
4.37
3.71
4.60
Win
Not rated
4.50
4.00
Value
4.04
4.34
4.00
4.41
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.00
Accommodation
3.78
4.09
3.50
4.26
Not rated
4.50
Win
3.22
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert and experienced faculty
  • +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
  • +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
  • +Exceptional, passionate, and approachable lecturers/professors
  • +Welcoming, supportive community and helpful staff
  • +Beautiful location with abundant activities and resources
  • +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
  • +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
  • +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
  • +Balanced academic and social experience with city life
  • +Good academic support and course content
  • +Campus proximity to city centre and positive atmosphere

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Strong focus on practical and real-world application
  • +Welcoming and sociable student environment
  • +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
  • +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
  • +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
  • -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
  • -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
  • -Discrimination and mishandling of complaints.
  • -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
  • -Poor quality of teaching and insufficient learning resources.
  • -Lack of support and consideration for student well-being, exacerbated by external disruptions.
  • -Substandard student experience due to COVID-19 and strikes.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common source of dissatisfaction.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are recurring themes.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
Rating summary
What students say

Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.

This institution garners commendable reviews, with its **Location** standing out as the highest-rated aspect. **Student Life**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** also received very positive scores. The **Accomodation** received the lowest rating, though it remains a solid score, indicating room for improvement in this specific area while other facets of the university experience are well-regarded.

This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.

Boasting strong performance across many aspects, this institution particularly excels in its **Location** and **Student Life**, both scoring above 4.6. **Facilities** and **Internationality** also receive commendations. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the lowest-rated area, though still a respectable 4.26. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid and well-rounded offering to its students.

Nothing to show

This institution garners impressive scores, particularly in **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Value**, all receiving 4.5 stars. Its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality** also score well with a solid 4 stars. The university demonstrates excellence in student experience and practical aspects, with areas of strong student support and campus amenities.

This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.

With an average rating of 4.51/5 from 71 reviews, ~99% are positive, praising excellent lecturers, beautiful location, and supportive staff. One review mentioned negative experiences regarding discrimination.

Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.

With a 4.49/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting a good balance of education, social life, and city activities. A small fraction (~2%) mention issues with course content delivery and a lack of support during disruptive periods.

Nothing to show

Both reviews are highly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 average. Students praised supportive and knowledgeable lecturers, a strong focus on employability, and a welcoming, friendly atmosphere with sociable students.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
61%
43%
64%
0%
100%
67%
4★
44%
32%
29%
24%
0%
0%
33%
3★
19%
6%
14%
10%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
1%
14%
1%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

I received Disability Discrimination

What I liked was the building itself, it is rather stunning, however... Whilst attending an annual PhD review, derogatory remarks were made against my speech, which is often slurred and incoherent when stressed due to being autistic. Bangor University not only ignored and undermined my complaint, but went further to add additional abuse. Discrimination policies and the Equality Act 2010 mean nothing to Bangor University. I would advise avoiding.

Nothing to show

High class

A fantastic university of high class, high ambition and high prospects for the future. I'm proud to have cardiff on my cv and am privileged to be part if such a fantastic institution, I wouldn't have rather spent my four years at undergraduate level anywhere else.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close