London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Hult International Business School vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Greenwich School of Management vs London Academy of Trading - LAT
Side-by-side comparison from 413 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert, approachable faculty and high-quality teaching
- +Strong career preparation and marketable skills development
- +Excellent facilities and a supportive learning environment
- +Strong career services and networking opportunities
- +Practical, hands-on learning with experienced faculty
- +Diverse international environment and global alumni network
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Excellent facilities and convenient location
- +Strong academic and personal development support
- +Practical learning and real-world skills
- +Experienced and supportive faculty
- +Inclusive and collaborative environment
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Abundant opportunities for involvement and engagement.
- -Poor teaching quality and unclear learning expectations.
- -Lack of structure and significant workload.
- -Disappointing careers service and limited social life.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Facility quality and professor standards are inconsistent.
- -Admission standards are perceived as too low.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
- -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
- -Limited course variety and depth.
- -Inconsistent faculty quality and support.
- -Inconvenient campus locations and access.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and unhelpful staff, are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered, leading to disengagement.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores nearing 4.8. **Professors** also score highly at 4.26. Conversely, **Student Life** is the lowest-rated area, with a score of 3.64, followed by **Accomodation** at 3.79. Other aspects like Facilities and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
This university garners impressive scores, particularly in **Internationality** (4.77) and **Location** (4.58). Professors also receive high marks at 4.47. Facilities, Student Life, and Value are all rated favorably above 4.0. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, scoring significantly lower at 3.25, indicating a potential area for improvement.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.
Examining the university's ratings reveals a distinct pattern. The strongest areas are Facilities and Value, both scoring a high 4.1. Internationality also performs well at 3.5. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest point with a low 1.85 rating. Student Life and Location also received moderate scores, indicating areas with potential for improvement.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution scores exceptionally well in several key areas. It excels in its **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation**, all receiving perfect marks. **Professors** and **Internationality** are also strong, earning a solid 4 out of 5. The university's **Value** is also rated a respectable 4, indicating good return on investment. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering, particularly in its campus environment and amenities.
Nearly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive environment, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent facilities. A small percentage (around 3.4%) mention issues like poor lecturing, inconsistent grading, and lack of social life.
Approximately 95.4% of 65 reviews are positive, highlighting networking, job opportunities, practical learning, and supportive faculty. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with staff competence and course materials.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.
With a 3.5/5 average rating, reviews are mixed, with roughly 50% negative feedback. Students appreciate practical learning and experienced faculty, but some note a limited course selection.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a perfect 5/5 average rating. The sole reviewer highlighted abundant opportunities, including study abroad and co-op programs, and engaging communities. No negative feedback was recorded.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
One of my favourite aspects about Hult is its diversity. By meeting people from all over the world with diverse histories and customs, you can get a sense of what their home nations are like. I also enjoy the help the staff provides every step of the way.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
