London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Hult International Business School vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Kingston Business School vs Greenwich School of Management

Side-by-side comparison from 418 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Acacia Learning (5.00)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 0/7 categories
Hult International Business School: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 0/7 categories
Kingston Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Greenwich School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
London Academy of Trading - LAT: wins 0/7 categories
Acacia Learning: wins 7/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
London, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
64 reviews
×
Best programme: International Business
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
London, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor in Management
London, The United Kingdom
3.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Banking and Finance
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
London, The United Kingdom
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: MBA
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.12
4.44
4.25
4.10
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
4.78
4.58
4.74
4.00
3.25
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.26
4.47
4.75
4.25
3.85
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.80
4.77
4.60
4.00
3.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
3.65
4.18
4.56
4.25
2.75
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.05
4.13
4.50
4.25
4.10
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.80
3.25
4.32
4.00
1.85
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Strong career services and networking opportunities
  • +Practical, hands-on learning with experienced faculty
  • +Diverse international environment and global alumni network
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and convenient location
  • +Strong academic and personal development support
  • +Supportive & engaged faculty
  • +Academic growth & new learning opportunities
  • +Prestigious location & student support
  • +Practical learning and real-world skills
  • +Experienced and supportive faculty
  • +Inclusive and collaborative environment

Nothing to show

  • +Superior quality learning
  • +Life-changing academic outcomes
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
  • -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
  • -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
  • -Facility quality and professor standards are inconsistent.
  • -Admission standards are perceived as too low.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
  • -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
  • -Inconvenient course scheduling and unclear academic policies.
  • -Insufficient and outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Lack of engagement from faculty and limited career support.
  • -Limited course variety and depth.
  • -Inconsistent faculty quality and support.
  • -Inconvenient campus locations and access.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor communication and administrative issues are frequent frustrations.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unhelpful instructors are common complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.

This university garners impressive scores, particularly in **Internationality** (4.77) and **Location** (4.58). Professors also receive high marks at 4.47. Facilities, Student Life, and Value are all rated favorably above 4.0. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, scoring significantly lower at 3.25, indicating a potential area for improvement.

Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.

Across multiple aspects, the institution receives commendable feedback. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value are particularly strong areas, all scoring 4.25. Location and Accommodation are rated well at 4, with Internationality also receiving a solid 4 rating. The university demonstrates a consistent level of quality throughout these evaluated areas.

Examining the university's ratings reveals a distinct pattern. The strongest areas are Facilities and Value, both scoring a high 4.1. Internationality also performs well at 3.5. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest point with a low 1.85 rating. Student Life and Location also received moderate scores, indicating areas with potential for improvement.

Nothing to show

Across all assessed aspects, this institution achieves a perfect score of 5. It excels equally in every surveyed area, demonstrating outstanding strengths in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. Consequently, there are no specific weak areas to highlight.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.

Approximately 95.4% of 65 reviews are positive, highlighting networking, job opportunities, practical learning, and supportive faculty. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with staff competence and course materials.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.

All four reviews are positive, resulting in an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight supportive staff and professors, academic growth opportunities, and manageable workloads as key strengths.

With a 3.5/5 average rating, reviews are mixed, with roughly 50% negative feedback. Students appreciate practical learning and experienced faculty, but some note a limited course selection.

Nothing to show

The single review is highly positive (100%), awarding a 5/5 rating. This feedback highlights a superior quality of learning that positively impacted the student's life.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
53%
75%
25%
50%
0%
100%
4★
44%
30%
25%
75%
0%
0%
0%
3★
18%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
2%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
1★
1%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

DIVERSITY

One of my favourite aspects about Hult is its diversity. By meeting people from all over the world with diverse histories and customs, you can get a sense of what their home nations are like. I also enjoy the help the staff provides every step of the way.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close