Universidad Bolivariana de Venezuela - UBV vs Universidad Nacional Abierta - UNA vs Universidad Santa Maria - USM vs Universidad Monteávila vs Universidad Nacional Experimental Simón Rodríguez - UNESR

Side-by-side comparison from 65 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Monteávila (5.00)
Universidad Bolivariana de Venezuela - UBV: wins 3/6 categories
Universidad Nacional Abierta - UNA: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Santa Maria - USM: wins 2/6 categories
Universidad Monteávila: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Nacional Experimental Simón Rodríguez - UNESR: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Nueva Esparta - UNE: wins 1/6 categories
Instituto Universitario Tecnológico Américo Vespucio - IUTAV: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Best programme: Law
Caracas, Venezuela
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
3.98
3.92
Not rated
3.75
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.00
4.00
3.83
Not rated
3.43
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.00
3.23
4.20
Win
Not rated
4.13
2.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.00
Win
3.50
3.95
Not rated
3.88
1.00
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.00
4.03
Win
Not rated
4.00
1.00
Not rated
Value
4.00
Win
3.73
3.70
Not rated
3.63
1.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
Win
3.50
2.93
Not rated
2.57
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Highly qualified teachers and pleasant student environment
  • +Good facilities and safety
  • +Easy access to university
  • +Flexible and distance learning
  • +Accessible and inclusive admission
  • +Strong academic support and quality education
  • +Excellent professors and academic staff
  • +Good facilities and resources
  • +Practical learning opportunities and patient access
  • +Excellent teachers and integral formation
  • +High academic demand and professional preparation
  • +Supportive campus environment
  • +Dynamic and accessible educational environment with committed professors.
  • +Diverse and flexible academic programs.
  • +Encouragement of creativity, research, and social commitment.
  • +Relevant, advanced career programs
  • +Professional development and expertise
  • +Conducive study environment

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and outdated curriculum are a problem.
  • -Lack of teacher engagement and support for student understanding.
  • -Outdated digital infrastructure and difficulty accessing information.
  • -Perceived low academic standards and a focus on quantity over quality.
  • -Poor communication and unclear instructions.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Lack of support and responsiveness from staff.
  • -Poor academic organization and lack of essential resources like laboratories.
  • -Frequent absence of teaching staff due to low salaries and poor compensation.
  • -University unpreparedness for complex degree programs.
  • -Insufficient qualified teaching staff leads to underqualified instructors.
  • -Curriculum reduction omits essential subjects.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Demonstrating a consistently high performance, this institution received uniform scores of 4 out of 5 across all evaluated aspects. No specific category emerged as a standout strength or weakness, with facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all achieving equal recognition. This suggests a well-rounded and uniformly positive university experience.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in **Location** and **Student Life**, both earning perfect scores. **Facilities** also rank highly, indicating a well-equipped campus. Conversely, **Professors** received the lowest rating, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other aspects like **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall within a moderate range.

Academic strengths emerge prominently, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.2. Student Life and Internationality also score well, reflecting positive campus experiences and a global outlook. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.93. Facilities and Value are moderately rated, suggesting room for improvement.

This institution presents a uniform rating across all assessed aspects, with no standout strengths or weaknesses. All surveyed categories—facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value—received identical scores. The consistent feedback suggests an even performance across the board, without any particular area excelling or falling significantly behind.

Overall, this university garners positive feedback across most aspects. Professors and student life stand out as particular strengths. However, accommodation received the lowest marks, indicating a significant area for improvement. The university also scored moderately well in facilities, location, internationality, and value, suggesting a generally satisfactory, though not exceptional, experience in these regards.

This institution shines in its **location**, receiving a perfect score, and demonstrates solid performance in **facilities**. However, significant weaknesses are apparent in **student life**, **internationality**, and **value**, all earning a low rating of 1. **Professors** and **accommodation** fall in the middle range, suggesting areas for development alongside the lower-scoring aspects.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight excellent teachers and facilities, alongside a pleasant and safe environment. There is minimal negative feedback regarding administrative processes.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.2/5. Students praise flexibility, time management, and the ability to study and work concurrently, citing the distance learning model and accessible educational materials.

Approximately 74% of 40 reviews are positive, highlighting good professors and facilities. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions teacher disengagement and outdated online resources.

All three reviews are highly positive, contributing to a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students praise the integral education, professional preparation, highly trained teachers, and overall positive campus environment. No negative feedback was provided.

90% of reviewers praise the dynamic environment, quality professors, and diverse programs. One reviewer noted concerns about professor feedback and missing faculty, representing 10% of feedback.

The university receives generally positive feedback, with ~75% of reviews being highly favorable. Some minor concerns were noted about limited transportation access and teaching staff qualifications.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
20%
50%
100%
60%
50%
0%
4★
100%
80%
23%
0%
30%
25%
0%
3★
0%
0%
23%
0%
0%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
25%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

One of the best

I can consider that it is one of the best universities in Venezuela, good functioning of the facilities and excellent teachers. Incredible environment to develop and very good areas for students.

Nothing to show

Vet

The Simón Rodríguez University had many shortcomings in terms of the study and organization to teach the degree in veterinary medicine, there were not even laboratories and the teaching staff was very infrequent due to the very low salary that the teachers received for their work, the university did not I was prepared to take on a career of that magnitude.

Not the best moment for this university

At this moment, this is not the best university to study on Venezuela, it doesn't have enough teachers for all the subjects, because of that, there are students teaching, they are not even graduated. Also they reduced the career from 5 to 4 years, that wasn't good because now we don't see some important subjects that help on the field of engineering. I don't recommend it at this moment.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close