Universidad Anáhuac vs Colegio Nacional de Educación Profesional Técnica - CONALEP vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Ironhack vs Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas - CIDE

Side-by-side comparison from 126 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Anáhuac (4.60)
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 1/7 categories
Colegio Nacional de Educación Profesional Técnica - CONALEP: wins 0/7 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Ironhack: wins 3/7 categories
Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas - CIDE: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad Tres Culturas - UTC : wins 0/7 categories
Gustavo A Madero Technological Institute II - ITGAM II: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Cancun, Mexico
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
37 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Chemical and Process Engineering
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: Political Science (International Relations)
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Best programme: Architecture
Category ratings
Facilities
4.53
3.10
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
4.50
4.06
Location
4.49
4.10
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
4.00
4.18
Professors
4.42
4.30
Not rated
3.00
4.00
4.00
4.53
Win
Internationality
4.58
3.20
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
3.50
3.74
Student life
4.63
3.89
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
4.00
4.12
Value
4.58
4.20
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
3.50
4.17
Accommodation
4.64
Win
2.80
Not rated
4.00
2.00
4.00
3.66
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Integral formation and practical application of knowledge
  • +Focus on developing leaders with values and strategic vision
  • +Academic excellence, personal growth, and community engagement
  • +Accessible short career options with good teachers
  • +Personal and academic improvement opportunities
  • +Direct path to employment after high school

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Challenging academics and preparation for impactful careers
  • +Supportive community and strong friendships
  • +Valuable educational experience despite demanding workload
  • +Excellent teachers and well-maintained facilities
  • +Flexible scheduling and convenient location options
  • +User-friendly platform and diverse payment choices
  • +Strong academic programs and practical preparation
  • +Supportive and effective professors
  • +Excellent facilities and extracurricular opportunities
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Students face difficulties with unresponsive administrative and management issues.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
  • -Limited food variety and a small library with few books are dissatisfying.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching and unengaging course content are common complaints.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Inefficient administrative and management practices cause frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause problems.
  • -Facilities and resources are inadequate.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are outdated.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 4.67. **Value** and **Internationality** also received high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **Professors** at 4.42, which represents the weakest performance among the evaluated aspects. Facilities and location are rated very favorably, around 4.5.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its academic offerings and surrounding environment. Professors received a near-perfect score of 4.3, complemented by a highly rated location (4.1) and strong value for money (4.2). Student life also scored well at 3.89. Conversely, accommodation emerged as the primary area for improvement, with a rating of 2.8, followed by facilities at 3.1. Internationality stands at a moderate 3.2.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This institution scores exceptionally well in internationality and value, both receiving top marks. Facilities and professors are also strong points, with solid 4-star ratings. Areas for improvement include accommodation, which received a lower rating of 2 stars, and student life and location, both scoring 3 stars. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering, particularly for international students and those prioritizing return on investment.

This university's facilities stand out with an excellent rating of 4.5. Professors and student life also received solid scores of 4. Areas like location and accommodation are rated favorably at 4. The university's internationality and value propositions are its weakest points, both scoring 3.5.

This university receives strong marks in several key areas, with Professors earning the highest rating. Student Life and Location are also well-regarded, alongside Value. Facilities and Internationality are rated moderately well. The weakest area of performance is Accomodation, which received the lowest score among the surveyed categories.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University students overwhelmingly praise its integral formation, practical study plans, and focus on developing leaders. This ~100% positive feedback highlights strong academic programs, professional readiness, and personal growth opportunities.

With an average rating of 4.32/5 from 31 reviews, approximately 97% are positive. Students praise accessible teachers and career opportunities. Some negative feedback notes small spaces and untidy bathrooms.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a 4/5 average rating from one review. The single review indicates a highly positive experience, despite some mention of a demanding workload and professors with less effective teaching skills.

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise good teachers, functional facilities, and an interactive platform. Convenient payment options and flexible schedules are also highlighted.

Nearly all reviews are positive, praising excellent teachers, good facilities, and strong academic programs. A small percentage of negative feedback was noted.

Rating distribution
5★
62%
55%
0%
50%
0%
0%
58%
4★
35%
29%
0%
0%
100%
100%
30%
3★
3%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4%
1★
0%
3%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close