Universidad Manuela Beltrán - UMB vs Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC vs Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC vs Universidad Central - Ucentral vs Fundación Universidad de América

Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO (5.00)
Universidad Manuela Beltrán - UMB: wins 0/6 categories
Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC: wins 3/6 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Central - Ucentral: wins 1/6 categories
Fundación Universidad de América: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO: wins 2/6 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Fashion Engineering
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Education Management
Best programme: Architecture
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
4.60
Win
Not rated
4.33
1.00
4.00
Not rated
Location
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.33
Win
1.00
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.67
Not rated
4.00
1.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.00
4.67
Not rated
3.00
1.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.20
Win
Not rated
3.67
1.00
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.00
4.17
Win
Not rated
4.00
1.00
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.00
1.00
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, accredited programs with well-equipped facilities and practical application of knowledge.
  • +Emphasis on creativity, research, and instilling strong values for responsible and ethical professionals.
  • +Opportunities for diverse practical experiences and national/international student exchange programs.
  • +High academic quality and standards
  • +Flexible study options and time management
  • +Committed and qualified professors

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive environment & student well-being
  • +Academic focus & professional growth
  • +Welcoming campus & convenient location
  • +Supportive and high-quality teaching
  • +Ample green campus spaces
  • +Emphasis on fostering individual creative development.
  • +High-quality education and professional training across diverse fields.
  • +Focus on personal growth and becoming better individuals.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of career services and job placement support.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and ineffective management.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive faculty.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated curriculum and lack of focus on professional development.
  • -Poor administrative and management practices.
  • -Limited international opportunities and low university ranking.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently cited.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support causes frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution boasts impressive strengths in several key areas. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received excellent ratings of 4. Professors also garnered positive feedback with a score of 4. However, facilities represent a weaker point, scoring a 3, while the location received no rating.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.66. **Professors** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** are the areas with the lowest scores, at 4. These ratings suggest a well-regarded university with some room for improvement in specific logistical aspects.

Nothing to show

This institution receives notable strengths in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both scoring 4.33. **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** also present solid performance, averaging a 4.0. The university's **Student Life** is rated moderately well at 3.67, while **Internationality** stands as its weakest area with a score of 3.

This institution demonstrates exceptional performance across all surveyed categories, receiving a perfect score of 1 in every aspect. Consequently, there are no distinct strongest or weakest areas, as the university excels uniformly in its facilities, professor quality, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. This indicates a remarkably consistent and high-achieving environment.

An impressive showing across several key areas, this institution excels particularly in its **professors and internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at a strong 4 out of 5. The university also scores well for **value**, indicating a positive return for students.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.25/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight the high quality physiotherapy program, creative curriculum, and emphasis on developing responsible, dedicated professionals. Facilities and learning tools are also noted as beneficial.

All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the university's high academic quality, committed professors, flexible study options, and practical learning model.

Nothing to show

With 3.8/5 stars from 5 reviews, ~60% are positive, praising a cozy, well-located environment supporting professional growth and well-being. Academics are prioritized. No negative feedback was reported.

With a 2.5/5 average rating, reviews are split evenly, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative feedback. Positive comments highlight green spaces and satisfactory teaching quality. Negative reviews criticize obsolete curriculum, focus on money, and lack of international agreements or research promotion.

With an average rating of 5/5 stars, the 2 reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the freedom to explore creative processes and the university's reputation for high-quality education across various fields.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
25%
86%
0%
20%
0%
100%
0%
4★
75%
14%
0%
40%
50%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
40%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The worst experience

Do not study here, there are other better universities. The pensum are obsolete. The university is only interested in money. There are no international agreements, they do not have a good ranking, they do not promote research or culture of professional development

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close