Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA vs Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG vs Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP vs Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO vs Fundación Universidad de América
Side-by-side comparison from 19 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High quality programs and professional teachers
- +Supportive and amazing study environment with extracurriculars
- +Emphasis on practical skills and real-world preparation
- +Excellent faculty and academic level
- +Relevant and practical learning experiences
- +Attractive and accessible campus locations
Nothing to show
- +Accessible and opportunity-focused education for diverse backgrounds
- +Engaging and interactive learning with skilled, supportive professors
- +Practical programs promoting personal and professional growth
- +Supportive and high-quality teaching
- +Ample green campus spaces
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Communication is often poor and unhelpful.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.
Nothing to show
- -Poor syllabus quality and outdated academic programs are disappointing.
- -There are significant administrative and management issues present.
- -Outdated curriculum and lack of focus on professional development.
- -Poor administrative and management practices.
- -Limited international opportunities and low university ranking.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Exceptional marks were achieved in several areas, notably for **Location** (4.8) and **Professors** (4.6), along with strong **Value** (4.6). While still positive, **Facilities** and **Accommodation** received the lowest scores at 4.2 and 4.25 respectively. Overall, the university presents a highly regarded environment, with particular strengths in its accessible setting and teaching quality.
This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.
Nothing to show
This institution shines particularly in its value for money, boasting a 4.5 rating. Facilities and student life also received strong marks at 4.2, closely followed by professors at 4.17. However, accommodation and internationality represent areas for potential improvement, both scoring a 3. Location, while decent at 3.8, is not a standout feature compared to the university's strengths.
This institution demonstrates exceptional performance across all surveyed categories, receiving a perfect score of 1 in every aspect. Consequently, there are no distinct strongest or weakest areas, as the university excels uniformly in its facilities, professor quality, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. This indicates a remarkably consistent and high-achieving environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise high-quality study programs, excellent teachers, and a supportive environment for academic and extracurricular activities. Practical skills and hands-on experience are also highlighted.
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.
Nothing to show
With 5 positive reviews (~63%) and 1 negative (~12.5%), students highlight accessible education and practical programs. Some appreciate teacher quality and learning technology, while one found syllabus issues in a specific program.
With a 2.5/5 average rating, reviews are split evenly, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative feedback. Positive comments highlight green spaces and satisfactory teaching quality. Negative reviews criticize obsolete curriculum, focus on money, and lack of international agreements or research promotion.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Do not study here, there are other better universities. The pensum are obsolete. The university is only interested in money. There are no international agreements, they do not have a good ranking, they do not promote research or culture of professional development
Nothing to show
Nothing to show