Universidad Anáhuac vs Instituto Tecnológico de Celaya - ITCelaya vs Tecnológico Nacional de México vs Universidad Panamericana vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 53 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 0/2 categories
Instituto Tecnológico de Celaya - ITCelaya: wins 1/2 categories
Tecnológico Nacional de México: wins 0/2 categories
Universidad Panamericana: wins 0/2 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/2 categories
Ironhack: wins 1/2 categories
Universitas MH Thamrin: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Mechanical Engineer
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Aguascalientes, Mexico
4.10
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Jakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Hospital and Healthcare Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.52
4.00
4.00
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Location
4.52
4.00
5.00
4.25
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Professors
4.42
5.00
4.00
4.50
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Internationality
4.61
5.00
5.00
3.33
Not rated
3.00
3.50
Student life
4.64
5.00
5.00
3.67
Not rated
5.00
4.50
Value
4.64
5.00
Win
4.00
4.33
Not rated
3.00
4.50
Accommodation
4.67
5.00
4.00
3.75
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Integral formation and practical application of knowledge
  • +Focus on developing leaders with values and strategic vision
  • +Academic excellence, personal growth, and community engagement
  • +Excellent academic and sports facilities
  • +Attentive and supportive professors
  • +Vibrant and focused student community
  • +Relevant and comprehensive curriculum with modern technology
  • +Dedicated and supportive faculty
  • +Rich academic and cultural activities
  • +Highly qualified professors and academic excellence
  • +Strong business programs and professional connections
  • +Personalized attention and strong sense of community

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Relevant programs and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Practical learning and industry partnerships
  • +Dynamic and critical idea exchange
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Students face difficulties with unresponsive administrative and management issues.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and industry relevance disappoints students.
  • -Students are frustrated by administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a major concern.
  • -The curriculum is seen as irrelevant and not preparing students for the future.
  • -Intellectualism is perceived as cultish.
  • -Institutions are seen as unreliable sources of truth.
  • -There's a critique of seeking purpose through complex language and power.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder practical learning.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from faculty and administration.
  • -Lack of career support and relevant industry connections.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 4.67. **Value** and **Internationality** also received high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **Professors** at 4.42, which represents the weakest performance among the evaluated aspects. Facilities and location are rated very favorably, around 4.5.

This institution receives outstanding marks in several key areas. Professors are rated as excellent, and student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all considered exceptional. Facilities and location also score highly, indicating a strong overall offering. The weakest, though still very good, aspect is the facilities rating.

This institution garners exceptional scores, particularly excelling in its **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a perfect 5. Facilities, Professors, Accommodations, and Value are also highly rated, each earning a solid 4. While no areas fall below a strong standing, these latter categories represent the relative weakest points in its otherwise outstanding profile.

The university is highly rated for its professors, achieving a strong 4.5. Facilities and value also score well, both at 4.33. Student life, while respectable at 3.67, and accommodation at 3.75 represent areas where ratings are somewhat lower. Internationality is rated the lowest among all categories at 3.33.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This university garners excellent scores in several key areas. Notably, its **Professors** and **Accomodation** received perfect marks, indicating exceptional quality in teaching and living arrangements. **Student Life** and **Value** also scored very highly, suggesting a vibrant campus experience and good return on investment. The university's **Facilities** and **Location** are also well-regarded. The lowest rating was for **Internationality**, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University students overwhelmingly praise its integral formation, practical study plans, and focus on developing leaders. This ~100% positive feedback highlights strong academic programs, professional readiness, and personal growth opportunities.

With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). The single review highlights abundant academic and sports facilities, attentive professors, and a vibrant campus atmosphere.

These reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 100% of feedback rating the university 4-5 stars. Students highlight excellent technology, a relevant curriculum, dedicated teachers, and strong engineering programs as key strengths.

University students praise academic excellence, professor quality, and modern facilities. ~92% of feedback is positive, with one reviewer expressing concerns about intellectualism.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Both reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a great and relevant campus with diverse programs, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent resources. Practical learning and industry partnerships are appreciated.

Rating distribution
5★
68%
0%
100%
33%
0%
50%
100%
4★
38%
100%
0%
58%
0%
0%
0%
3★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close