SRM University vs Christ University Bangalore vs BJB College Bhubaneswar vs Indian Institute of Technology Madras vs Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology

Side-by-side comparison from 69 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Indian Institute of Technology Madras (4.80)
SRM University: wins 0/6 categories
Christ University Bangalore: wins 0/6 categories
BJB College Bhubaneswar: wins 0/6 categories
Indian Institute of Technology Madras: wins 5/6 categories
Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology: wins 1/6 categories
Patrician College of Arts and Science - PCAS: wins 0/6 categories
Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies - VISTAS: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Chennai, India
4.30
Read more reviews
32 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Data Science and Artificial Intelligence
Best programme: Bachelor of Software Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
3.88
3.83
Not rated
4.75
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.47
3.69
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.50
3.76
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
3.83
Not rated
4.25
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.93
3.73
Not rated
4.50
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.88
3.77
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.81
3.06
Not rated
4.25
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality education and helpful, experienced professors.
  • +Excellent exposure through diverse programs and industry-aligned curriculum.
  • +Strong focus on placements and practical learning experiences.
  • +Strong academic curriculum and quality education
  • +Holistic development through internships and co-curricular activities
  • +Disciplined and structured environment with ample opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent professors and industry-relevant curriculum
  • +High-quality research facilities and opportunities
  • +Strong academic reputation and campus environment
  • +Strong academic programs and helpful teachers
  • +Excellent reputation for studies and placements
  • +Diverse course offerings in engineering and technology

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Biased faculty and unfair grading practices.
  • -Poor campus life and lack of support for genuine talent.
  • -Strict rules and lack of freedom hinder student experience.
  • -Outdated curriculum and unhelpful faculty lead to poor academic outcomes.
  • -Administrative issues and poor management create a frustrating environment.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Poor administrative and management support.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum quality.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution achieves strong performance, particularly in Student Life, with a rating of 3.93. Facilities and Value also score highly at 3.875. The university's Location, however, received the lowest rating at 3.47, alongside Professors and Internationality which both scored 3.5. Accommodations also received a solid rating of 3.81.

With the highest scores in **Facilities** and **Internationality** (both 3.83), this university excels in providing resources and fostering a global environment. It also garners strong marks for its **Professors** and **Value**. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.06, indicating an area that could benefit from improvement. Overall, the institution presents a solid academic and social offering with room for enhancement in student housing.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptional marks, particularly excelling in its professors, location, and perceived value, all achieving a perfect 5. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded at 4.5 and 4.25 respectively. The facilities are rated highly at 4.75, while accommodation, at 4.25, represents the lowest score, though still very positive.

The institution garners excellent marks in most areas, with accommodation standing out at a perfect 5. Facilities, professors, location, and student life all received a strong 4.5. Internationality is rated a solid 4, representing the only area below the highest tier. Overall, the university presents a highly positive picture with consistently high scores.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are predominantly positive, with an average rating of 4.34/5. Students praise the quality of education, helpful faculty, and good environment. A small portion (~3%) expressed concerns about campus life and faculty bias.

Approximately 84% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, holistic development, and good opportunities. Around 16% of feedback mentions rigidity and a lack of flexibility.

Nothing to show

All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students praise brilliant professors, industry-relevant curriculum, excellent research facilities, and engaging technical events.

With a 4.5/5 average rating from two reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight helpful teachers and strong academics.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
56%
19%
0%
75%
50%
0%
0%
4★
28%
55%
0%
25%
50%
0%
0%
3★
13%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
3%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close