Universidad Anáhuac vs Instituto de Ciencias y Estudios Superiores de Tamaulipas - ICEST vs Tecnológico Nacional de México vs Universidad Panamericana vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 56 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Leadership and values development
- +Academic excellence and practical application
- +Supportive community and modern facilities
Nothing to show
- +Relevant and comprehensive curriculum with modern technology
- +Dedicated and supportive faculty
- +Rich academic and cultural activities
- +Highly qualified professors and academic excellence
- +Strong business programs and professional connections
- +Personalized attention and strong sense of community
- +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
- +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
- +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
Nothing to show
- +Affordable education and accessible quality academics
- +Diverse programs available
- +Strong medical school program
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
Nothing to show
- -Students are frustrated by administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a major concern.
- -The curriculum is seen as irrelevant and not preparing students for the future.
- -Intellectualism is perceived as cultish.
- -Institutions are seen as unreliable sources of truth.
- -There's a critique of seeking purpose through complex language and power.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Ineffective communication and administrative inefficiencies.
- -Lack of academic support and engagement from instructors.
This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.
Nothing to show
This institution garners exceptional scores, particularly excelling in its **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a perfect 5. Facilities, Professors, Accommodations, and Value are also highly rated, each earning a solid 4. While no areas fall below a strong standing, these latter categories represent the relative weakest points in its otherwise outstanding profile.
The university is highly rated for its professors, achieving a strong 4.5. Facilities and value also score well, both at 4.33. Student life, while respectable at 3.67, and accommodation at 3.75 represent areas where ratings are somewhat lower. Internationality is rated the lowest among all categories at 3.33.
Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and receives a perfect score for them. Professors are rated highly, though not as outstanding as other areas. The university's weakest point is its internationality, indicated by a moderate score. Overall, it presents a very positive environment for students, with value for money also being a strong suit.
With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
These reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 100% of feedback rating the university 4-5 stars. Students highlight excellent technology, a relevant curriculum, dedicated teachers, and strong engineering programs as key strengths.
University students praise academic excellence, professor quality, and modern facilities. ~92% of feedback is positive, with one reviewer expressing concerns about intellectualism.
All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.
Nothing to show
Based on one review, this university is praised for affordable and accessible education with diverse programs, particularly its Medical school. The feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% indicating a good experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
