EU Business School vs School of Management and Tourism - HES-SO vs EHL Hospitality Business School - EHL vs Alfred Nobel Open Business School vs Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts - HSLU

Side-by-side comparison from 298 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
EU Business School: wins 0/3 categories
School of Management and Tourism - HES-SO: wins 3/3 categories
EHL Hospitality Business School - EHL : wins 0/3 categories
Alfred Nobel Open Business School: wins 0/3 categories
Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts - HSLU: wins 0/3 categories
Les Roches Global Hospitality Education Switzerland: wins 0/3 categories
Franklin University Switzerland - FUS: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Barcelona, Spain
3.80
Read more reviews
236 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Tourism
Best programme: BSc in International Hospitality Management
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Business Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
4.06
5.00
Win
4.78
4.00
2.50
4.50
Not rated
Location
4.70
5.00
4.29
4.00
4.50
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.03
5.00
4.56
5.00
3.50
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.70
5.00
4.93
5.00
2.50
5.00
Not rated
Student life
4.23
5.00
Win
4.73
4.00
3.50
4.50
Not rated
Value
3.87
5.00
4.75
5.00
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.46
5.00
Win
4.60
4.00
4.00
4.50
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive community and approachable, knowledgeable professors
  • +Diverse international environment and networking opportunities
  • +Practical, engaging courses with real-world business insights
  • +Diverse and engaging courses in multiple languages.
  • +Opportunities for international experience and language immersion.
  • +Convenient location with nearby attractions and social activities.
  • +Supportive community and personal growth
  • +Blend of academic rigor and practical opportunities
  • +Engaging curriculum and passionate faculty
  • +Engaging, real-world focused professors and interactive learning
  • +Opportunities for practical application and recognition through competitions
  • +Personal growth and boosted confidence
  • +Practical, interdisciplinary teaching
  • +Pleasant atmosphere with lecturers and students
  • +Good cafeteria food options
  • +Practical classes and internships emphasized.
  • +Soft skills and networking opportunities valued.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Disorganized administration and management issues.
  • -Poor quality education and unsupportive facilities.
  • -Lack of accreditation and questionable educational value.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Overcrowded classes and insufficient support systems create a challenging academic environment.
  • -Students express frustration with administrative and management issues.
  • -Many students find the facilities to be outdated and lacking.
  • -Concerns are raised about the quality and relevance of the curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment detract from the learning experience.
  • -Limited career support and job placement opportunities are a major concern.
  • -Material is not fully in English and local students are insular.
  • -Teachers lack enthusiasm and suggest inadequate translation tools.
  • -The program has too many minor subjects, hindering focus on core learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum or teaching methods are often seen as unengaging or ineffective.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners high marks in several key areas, with **Location** and **Internationality** standing out at an impressive 4.7. Student Life also scores well, nearing 4.2. However, **Accomodation** presents a notable weaker point, receiving a score of 3.46. Facilities and Professors both hover around the 4.0 mark, with Value slightly lower at 3.87.

Exceptional marks were awarded across all assessed areas, indicating a consistently high-quality experience. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all received perfect scores. This suggests no single area stands out as a particular weakness, with the university demonstrating uniform excellence in its offerings.

This institution garners excellent scores, with Internationality standing out as its strongest area. Facilities and Student Life also received exceptionally high marks. While still strong, Location shows the lowest rating compared to other evaluated aspects, though overall feedback indicates a very positive university experience.

Remarkably, this institution achieves top scores in several key areas. Its strongest aspects are Professors and Internationality, both earning a perfect 5. Facilities, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, and Value are also highly rated at 4. The only area not explicitly detailed is the weakest, but the consistent high marks suggest a well-rounded university experience.

This institution excels in its **Location** and **Accomodation**, both scoring a strong 4.5 and 4 respectively. The **Professors** and **Student Life** also receive a solid 3.5. However, **Facilities** and **Internationality** present areas for improvement, each receiving a lower rating of 2.5. The university offers good **Value** at 4.

This institution boasts outstanding ratings in several key areas, particularly its **location** and **internationality**, both receiving a perfect score. **Facilities**, **student life**, and **accommodation** also score exceptionally high at 4.5. While **professors** are rated well at 4, the university's **value** is its weakest point, with a score of 3.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a welcoming atmosphere, strong community, and knowledgeable, supportive professors. A small percentage (~7.6%) of negative feedback points to disorganization and a basic curriculum.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 5/5, students highlight interesting and varied courses, opportunities for international study, and a convenient location. Additional comments mention a small but functional study room and student association events.

Students praise the supportive atmosphere and diverse opportunities. The curriculum is effective, fostering personal growth and career readiness. While overwhelmingly positive, there are zero negative reviews.

With a 5/5 average rating from one review, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight inspiring professors, interactive classes, and significant personal growth.

With an average rating of 3/5, university student feedback is split evenly. Positive comments highlight practical teaching and a pleasant atmosphere, while negative points focus on limited space and international student integration challenges.

With an average rating of 3.5/5, ~50% of reviews are positive, noting improved soft skills and practical classes. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
25%
100%
82%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
45%
0%
13%
0%
50%
50%
0%
3★
22%
0%
5%
0%
0%
50%
0%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
1★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
EU Business School: A Launchpad for Success

I'm thrilled to share my experience at EU Business School. The professors are industry experts who bring real-world insights to the classroom. The classes are interactive and engaging, with a focus on practical applications. I've achieved amazing things, including internships, networking opportunities, and launching my own business project. The campus life is vibrant, with a diverse community of students from around the world. Overall, EU Business School has given me the skills, confidence, and network to pursue my entrepreneurial dreams. I highly recommend it to anyone seeking a business education that truly prepares you for the real worldworld.

Nothing to show

Learning Hospitality by Living it

Choosing EHL was a very intentional decision for me. As an extroverted person passionate about hospitality, I wanted a university where service excellence is not only taught but truly practiced. EHL stood out because of its balance between academic rigor and hands-on experience. The AP (preparatory year) program had a big impact on me. Working in operational roles such as fine dining service, front office, pastry taught me discipline, attention to detail, and how to perform under pressure. It gave me real confidence in guest interaction and teamwork. Academically, I especially enjoyed classes related to financial accounting and economics as they helped me better understand how people and businesses function together. EHL’s career support also made a real difference. The interview preparation and guidance helped me secure my Front Office internship at Jumeirah Marsa Al Arab, which was a major opportunity for me. What makes EHL distinctive is its international environment and high standards. You’re constantly surrounded by ambitious, driven students, which pushes me to grow both personally and professionally. My advice to future students is to fully embrace the operational experience; it builds resilience and professionalism that truly sets you apart.

Nothing to show

Emphasis on sustainability but too poor international interactions

What I liked: -Sustainable concerns of the school -Partnership with Social Education University in order to deliver social related modules What I didn't like while being registered to an international program: -Some material modules are still in German, some teachers suggested to translate them on Deepl -Local students are not very open-minded... tend to create their own circles and don't include international students -Even though the program is supposed to be taught in English, more minors are given in German than in English, which reduces the minors choices to 3 only... To improve: -Class materials and/or explanations can be given in English even though the student asked a question in Swiss-German (more inclusive) -More inclusive events, even though students can not be forced to take part in them, help international students to be included by locals Recommend? : I do not think that I would recommend international students to study there. I studied one year in Geneva, and the international program there is more inclusive than the one in Lucerne.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close