EU Business School vs School of Management and Tourism - HES-SO vs University of Zurich - UZH vs EHL Hospitality Business School - EHL vs University of Geneva - UNIGE
Side-by-side comparison from 349 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and approachable staff and teachers
- +Interactive classes with practical applications
- +International and diverse student environment
- +Diverse and engaging courses in multiple languages.
- +Opportunities for international experience and language immersion.
- +Convenient location with nearby attractions and social activities.
- +Welcoming and inclusive environment for all students
- +Supportive and dedicated professors
- +Effective and enjoyable learning facilities and resources
- +Strong global network and personal growth
- +Practical industry experience and diverse opportunities
- +Supportive and engaging learning environment
- +Multicultural environment and diverse colleagues
- +High-quality faculty with industry experience and strong academic reputation
- +Practical career preparation and enhanced job opportunities
- +Practical, interdisciplinary teaching
- +Pleasant atmosphere with lecturers and students
- +Good cafeteria food options
- +Practical classes and internships emphasized.
- +Soft skills and networking opportunities valued.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent, including poor communication and unhelpful staff.
- -The quality of education is considered basic, with a lack of proper study facilities and accreditation concerns.
- -Extracurricular activities are not supported, and the university prioritizes attendance over educational quality.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient support systems create a challenging academic environment.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
- -Lack of administrative support and unclear communication cause frustration.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or not up-to-date with industry standards.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and not preparing students for the future.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities are a common complaint.
- -Many students feel there is a lack of career support and networking opportunities.
- -Material is not fully in English and local students are insular.
- -Teachers lack enthusiasm and suggest inadequate translation tools.
- -The program has too many minor subjects, hindering focus on core learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum or teaching methods are often seen as unengaging or ineffective.
Excelling in several key areas, this university boasts impressive scores for **Location** and **Internationality**, both near perfect. **Student Life** also received a very positive assessment. However, **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker point, receiving the lowest rating. The university also earned solid marks for **Facilities** and **Professors**, with **Value** falling in the mid-range.
Exceptional marks were awarded across all assessed areas, indicating a consistently high-quality experience. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all received perfect scores. This suggests no single area stands out as a particular weakness, with the university demonstrating uniform excellence in its offerings.
This institution receives strong marks across most surveyed areas. Location and Facilities stand out with the highest ratings, indicating these are particular strengths. Student Life is the lowest-rated aspect, suggesting room for improvement in this domain. Other key areas like Professors, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are all rated positively, reflecting a generally well-regarded university experience.
Exhibiting particularly strong performance, the university achieved its highest rating in Internationality, followed closely by Facilities and Student Life. Conversely, Location received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. Other well-regarded areas include Accomodation, Value, and Professors, all scoring well above average.
An analysis of university ratings reveals a strong international focus and exceptional value, both scoring very high. The institution also excels in the quality of its professors. Among the surveyed aspects, student life received the lowest, though still positive, rating. Facilities and accommodation were also rated favorably, indicating a well-rounded student experience.
This institution excels in its **Location** and **Accomodation**, both scoring a strong 4.5 and 4 respectively. The **Professors** and **Student Life** also receive a solid 3.5. However, **Facilities** and **Internationality** present areas for improvement, each receiving a lower rating of 2.5. The university offers good **Value** at 4.
This institution boasts outstanding ratings in several key areas, particularly its **location** and **internationality**, both receiving a perfect score. **Facilities**, **student life**, and **accommodation** also score exceptionally high at 4.5. While **professors** are rated well at 4, the university's **value** is its weakest point, with a score of 3.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong student-staff relationships and a welcoming atmosphere. However, about 7% of feedback notes disorganization, basic curriculum, and communication issues.
With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 5/5, students highlight interesting and varied courses, opportunities for international study, and a convenient location. Additional comments mention a small but functional study room and student association events.
All 34 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.09/5. Students highlight welcoming environments, enjoyable student life, and effective facilities. Professors are often described as helpful and committed.
With an average rating of 4.77/5 from 57 reviews, ~95% highlight positive experiences. Recurring themes include skill development and valuable internships. No negative feedback was reported.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight multicultural environments, well-organized programs, and knowledgeable professors who are experts in their fields. The curriculum prepares students well for the job market.
With an average rating of 3/5, university student feedback is split evenly. Positive comments highlight practical teaching and a pleasant atmosphere, while negative points focus on limited space and international student integration challenges.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, ~50% of reviews are positive, noting improved soft skills and practical classes. No negative feedback was provided.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
Nothing to show
Known for outstanding education, the university offers rigorous academic programs and innovative teaching methods. The campus features modern architecture and a vibrant community atmosphere that stimulates intellectual curiosity. Professors are committed to student success and provide mentorship, while state-of-the-art amenities support academic research and collaboration. Comfortable on-campus accommodation enhances the student experience.
Choosing EHL was a very intentional decision for me. As an extroverted person passionate about hospitality, I wanted a university where service excellence is not only taught but truly practiced. EHL stood out because of its balance between academic rigor and hands-on experience. The AP (preparatory year) program had a big impact on me. Working in operational roles such as fine dining service, front office, pastry taught me discipline, attention to detail, and how to perform under pressure. It gave me real confidence in guest interaction and teamwork. Academically, I especially enjoyed classes related to financial accounting and economics as they helped me better understand how people and businesses function together. EHL’s career support also made a real difference. The interview preparation and guidance helped me secure my Front Office internship at Jumeirah Marsa Al Arab, which was a major opportunity for me. What makes EHL distinctive is its international environment and high standards. You’re constantly surrounded by ambitious, driven students, which pushes me to grow both personally and professionally. My advice to future students is to fully embrace the operational experience; it builds resilience and professionalism that truly sets you apart.
It is true that a diploma from a Swiss university isn't easy to get, but it is totally profitable. First, this program gives us opportunities to meet prestigious Swiss businessmen and businesswomen. Plus our professors are well-known and are the best in their domain. With a diploma from UNIGE, we have a career assured, especially if we want to work in Switzerland (one of the countries with the highest wages), but also internationally. Our university is located in the international city of Geneva, we can enjoy the little but pleasant student life with students from all around the world.
What I liked: -Sustainable concerns of the school -Partnership with Social Education University in order to deliver social related modules What I didn't like while being registered to an international program: -Some material modules are still in German, some teachers suggested to translate them on Deepl -Local students are not very open-minded... tend to create their own circles and don't include international students -Even though the program is supposed to be taught in English, more minors are given in German than in English, which reduces the minors choices to 3 only... To improve: -Class materials and/or explanations can be given in English even though the student asked a question in Swiss-German (more inclusive) -More inclusive events, even though students can not be forced to take part in them, help international students to be included by locals Recommend? : I do not think that I would recommend international students to study there. I studied one year in Geneva, and the international program there is more inclusive than the one in Lucerne.
Nothing to show
