Universidad Sergio Arboleda vs Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC vs Universidad Católica de Colombia - UCATOLICA vs Centro Colombo Americano vs Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca - UCMC

Side-by-side comparison from 21 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca - UCMC (5.00)
Universidad Sergio Arboleda: wins 3/7 categories
Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad Católica de Colombia - UCATOLICA: wins 1/7 categories
Centro Colombo Americano: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca - UCMC: wins 1/7 categories
Fundación Universitaria San Martín - SANMARTIN: wins 0/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: BSC Medical Laboratory Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.11
4.20
Win
3.50
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.56
Win
3.40
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.60
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.33
Win
3.20
3.00
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.44
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.22
4.40
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.89
3.60
4.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Passionate professors and vibrant learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and academic opportunities
  • +Strong career support and personal development
  • +Strong economics, law, and political science programs
  • +Excellent preparation for the labor market
  • +University prestige and history
  • +Strong academic programs with qualified instructors and research opportunities.
  • +Practical learning experiences and updated course content.
  • +Accessible location and vibrant campus life.

Nothing to show

  • +Expert faculty and hands-on learning
  • +Diverse and in-demand programs
  • +Convenient campus access

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of academic rigor and unchallenging coursework.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff creates confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
  • -The curriculum is sometimes perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of support and unclear expectations contribute to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.56, and in its **student life**, scoring 4.44. **Facilities** also fare well with a rating of 4.11. Conversely, the **accommodation** category shows the lowest score at 3.89, indicating it as a potential area for improvement. Ratings for professors, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-range.

Professors receive the highest marks, reflecting a strong academic core. Facilities and value also score well, indicating a positive learning environment and good return on investment. However, location and internationality present opportunities for improvement, with lower scores in these areas. Student life and accommodation fall within the middle range of ratings.

This institution demonstrates a strong performance in several key areas, particularly excelling in **location** with a rating of 4.5. **Professors**, **student life**, and **accommodation** also received favorable scores of 4. The university's **internationality** is its weakest area, rated at 3. Facilities are rated moderately at 3.5, while the overall **value** is considered good at 4.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates a notable strength in the quality of its professors, receiving a perfect score. Conversely, its location received no rating, indicating a potential area for improvement or a lack of data. Other aspects like facilities, student life, and accommodation were moderately rated, suggesting a generally satisfactory experience. Internationality scores were lower, and value for money was rated well.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

About 56% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic opportunities, professors, and growth. A small portion (11.1%) of negative feedback mentions a lack of academic challenge and lazy professors.

With an average rating of 4.67/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% of feedback is positive. Students praise rigorous economics and law programs, excellent professional preparation, and the university's prestige. No negative feedback was received.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight qualified instructors, strong research promotion, and efforts to improve practical education. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 5/5, all feedback is positive. Students praise the excellent faculty, good clinical sites, and the seamless integration of theory and practice. Accessibility via public transport or car is also highlighted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
11%
83%
33%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
44%
0%
67%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
33%
17%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
2★
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close