Universidad Sergio Arboleda vs Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM vs Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC vs Universidad Pedagógica Nacional - UPN vs Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO

Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Sergio Arboleda: wins 3/7 categories
Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Pedagógica Nacional - UPN: wins 1/7 categories
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO: wins 3/7 categories
Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores - ULIBERTADORES: wins 0/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Best programme: Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
4.11
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.20
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.56
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.80
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.17
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.33
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.44
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.20
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.22
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.89
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Passionate professors and vibrant learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and academic opportunities
  • +Strong career support and personal development

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent teaching quality and teacher attentiveness
  • +High-quality education provided by the institution
  • +Accessible and opportunity-focused education for diverse backgrounds
  • +Engaging and interactive learning with skilled, supportive professors
  • +Practical programs promoting personal and professional growth
  • +Professional development & industry relevance
  • +Life projects & research opportunities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of academic rigor and unchallenging coursework.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant environment.
  • -Lack of responsiveness to student concerns is a recurring problem.
  • -Poor syllabus quality and outdated academic programs are disappointing.
  • -There are significant administrative and management issues present.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities and equipment are consistently outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Instructors' teaching quality and availability are often insufficient.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.56, and in its **student life**, scoring 4.44. **Facilities** also fare well with a rating of 4.11. Conversely, the **accommodation** category shows the lowest score at 3.89, indicating it as a potential area for improvement. Ratings for professors, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-range.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Offering a truly standout experience, this university excels in its **Accomodation**, achieving a perfect score. Its **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value** are also strong points, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. The university's **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** are rated competently at 3, indicating areas for potential development alongside its already impressive strengths.

This institution shines particularly in its value for money, boasting a 4.5 rating. Facilities and student life also received strong marks at 4.2, closely followed by professors at 4.17. However, accommodation and internationality represent areas for potential improvement, both scoring a 3. Location, while decent at 3.8, is not a standout feature compared to the university's strengths.

Across all surveyed categories, this institution received uniform ratings. This indicates no particular strengths or weaknesses were identified in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The consistent scoring suggests an even distribution of perceived quality across these key aspects of the university experience.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

About 56% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic opportunities, professors, and growth. A small portion (11.1%) of negative feedback mentions a lack of academic challenge and lazy professors.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The single review expresses strong satisfaction, particularly praising the excellent teaching approach and thoroughness of instructors. This positive feedback represents 100% of the feedback, with an average rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

With 5 positive reviews (~63%) and 1 negative (~12.5%), students highlight accessible education and practical programs. Some appreciate teacher quality and learning technology, while one found syllabus issues in a specific program.

With a 4/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise the university's professional development and real-world opportunities. One reviewer suggested incorporating more training on modern technologies like Azure and Big Data.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
11%
0%
0%
0%
43%
0%
0%
4★
44%
0%
0%
100%
29%
100%
0%
3★
33%
0%
0%
0%
29%
0%
0%
2★
11%
0%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close