Universidad Manuela Beltrán - UMB vs Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO vs Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP vs Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO vs Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores - ULIBERTADORES

Side-by-side comparison from 23 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO (4.90)
Universidad Manuela Beltrán - UMB: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO: wins 5/7 categories
Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP: wins 0/7 categories
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO: wins 0/7 categories
Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores - ULIBERTADORES: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de La Salle - LASALLE: wins 2/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Fashion Engineering
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
4.38
Win
Not rated
4.20
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Location
Not rated
4.63
Win
Not rated
3.80
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.63
Not rated
4.17
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.00
4.13
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.75
Win
Not rated
4.20
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Value
4.00
4.50
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
4.63
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
3.67
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, accredited programs with well-equipped facilities and practical application of knowledge.
  • +Emphasis on creativity, research, and instilling strong values for responsible and ethical professionals.
  • +Opportunities for diverse practical experiences and national/international student exchange programs.
  • +High-quality faculty and engaging teaching methods
  • +Strong curriculum and diverse, recognized programs
  • +Efficient support services and professional growth opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Accessible and opportunity-focused education for diverse backgrounds
  • +Engaging and interactive learning with skilled, supportive professors
  • +Practical programs promoting personal and professional growth
  • +Professional development & industry relevance
  • +Life projects & research opportunities
  • +Excellent professors and quality education/curriculum
  • +Strong focus on ethics and humanistic values
  • +Downtown campus offering urban experience

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of career services and job placement support.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor syllabus quality and outdated academic programs are disappointing.
  • -There are significant administrative and management issues present.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities and equipment are consistently outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Instructors' teaching quality and availability are often insufficient.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Poor teaching quality and insufficient academic support are disliked.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution boasts impressive strengths in several key areas. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received excellent ratings of 4. Professors also garnered positive feedback with a score of 4. However, facilities represent a weaker point, scoring a 3, while the location received no rating.

Across multiple aspects, this institution receives commendations. Student life stands out as the strongest area, achieving the highest rating. The university also performs exceptionally well in professors, location, and accommodation. On the other hand, its weakest area is internationality, which, while still solid, is rated lower than other categories. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with a particularly strong showing in student engagement and academic resources.

Nothing to show

This institution shines particularly in its value for money, boasting a 4.5 rating. Facilities and student life also received strong marks at 4.2, closely followed by professors at 4.17. However, accommodation and internationality represent areas for potential improvement, both scoring a 3. Location, while decent at 3.8, is not a standout feature compared to the university's strengths.

Across all surveyed categories, this institution received uniform ratings. This indicates no particular strengths or weaknesses were identified in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The consistent scoring suggests an even distribution of perceived quality across these key aspects of the university experience.

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths, with an outstanding perfect score for **Value** and high marks for its **Professors**. The **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also received solid ratings. However, **Accomodation** is a moderately weaker area, and **Internationality** received the lowest score among the surveyed aspects.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.25/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight the high quality physiotherapy program, creative curriculum, and emphasis on developing responsible, dedicated professionals. Facilities and learning tools are also noted as beneficial.

With an average rating of 4.88/5 from 8 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students praise high-quality faculty, excellent curriculum, state-of-the-art facilities, and transformative learning experiences. No negative feedback was reported.

Nothing to show

With 5 positive reviews (~63%) and 1 negative (~12.5%), students highlight accessible education and practical programs. Some appreciate teacher quality and learning technology, while one found syllabus issues in a specific program.

With a 4/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise the university's professional development and real-world opportunities. One reviewer suggested incorporating more training on modern technologies like Azure and Big Data.

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5 stars. Students praise excellent teachers, quality education, and professional training that instills values and ethics.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
25%
88%
0%
43%
0%
33%
0%
4★
75%
13%
0%
29%
100%
67%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
29%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close