Universidad del valle de México - UVM vs Universidad Politécnica de San Luis Potosí - UPSLP vs Universidad Interamericana para el Desarrollo - UNID vs El Colegio de San Luis A.C. - COLSAN vs Instituto Tecnologico de San Luis Potosí - ITSLP
Side-by-side comparison from 37 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Accessible education via scholarships
- +Engaging professors and diverse academic offerings
- +Extracurricular activities and community involvement
- +Valuable certifications and unique educational system
- +Emphasis on practical teaching and values
- +Personalized attention and accessible learning environment
- +High quality teaching from knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Innovative programs and focus on student development
- +Academic excellence and strong faculty qualifications
- +Diverse and impactful social science programs
- +Opportunities for personal and academic growth
Nothing to show
- +Exceptional educational quality and learning opportunities.
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
- -Persistent, intrusive recruitment calls.
- -Ineffective and overwhelming communication channels.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
- -Poor academic quality and lack of support from staff.
- -Unrealistic expectations and inconsiderate policies for students.
- -Lack of professionalism and knowledge from some teachers.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Communication breakdowns and lack of clear information cause frustration.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of clear communication and support negatively impacts the student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
Academic strengths emerge clearly, with Professors and Student Life receiving the highest marks. Facilities and Location also score well. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Internationality, which received the lowest ratings. Value for money falls in the middle of the spectrum.
Overall, the university presents a neutral profile across all assessed areas, with no standout strengths or weaknesses. Ratings for facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all at a baseline level. This indicates a consistent, albeit unremarkable, experience in each of these critical university aspects.
Analysis of these university ratings reveals a mixed picture. The strongest areas include **Facilities**, scoring 3.55, and **Location** at 3.5. **Professors** and **Value** also received respectable scores around 3.1. Conversely, **Accomodation** (2.125) and **Internationality** (2.08) present the most significant areas for improvement, alongside **Student Life** at 2.875.
The institution presents a uniform rating of zero across all evaluated aspects: Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. Consequently, no specific areas stand out as particularly strong or weak; all facets are rated equally low. This indicates a consistent need for improvement across the entire university experience.
Nothing to show
Outstanding marks characterize this institution, particularly in Student Life and Accommodation, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, Professors, and Location are also highly regarded with 4.5 ratings, alongside a strong 4.5 for Value. Internationality stands out as the sole area with a slightly lower rating of 4, though still strong.
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Around 54% of reviews are positive, highlighting good resources and engaging professors. The average rating is 3.71/5, with minimal negative feedback.
With one review, the university has a perfect 5/5 rating. This single positive review highlights its excellent system and certifications.
~74% of students provide positive feedback, praising personalized attention and good teachers. However, ~28.6% of feedback expresses concerns about slow administration and inconsistent teacher quality.
With one review, this university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. The single feedback strongly praises the institution's social science programs and qualified faculty. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, university student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). One reviewer highlighted excellent educational quality and learning opportunities, particularly for Psychology.
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
The International Business Administration degree at Universidad del Valle de México is an academic journey that will strenghten the skills that you have while traching you diverse ways to apply them to the business world. Accounting, negotiation, finance, marketing, international trade, are just some of the main topics to mention that this degree allows you to deep dive into. Upon graduating, every student will have the required tools and skills to follwo their own professional path.
Nothing to show
If you are thinking about signing up here, I recommend that you better look for a serious university and not a duckling like this one. I tell you my experience: Of the teachers I had since the first semester, I can tell you that 3 are salvable, from then on the others leave much to be desired, from lack of professionalism to lack of knowledge about the subject they "taught". They are excellent collectors and they worry a lot because you pay in advance. They send you emails, SMS, WhatsApp, but when it comes to important information, like when your group is no longer profitable and you will have to take classes if you want with another career or to let you know that I do not know who happened to have 5 hours of a subject with only one teacher at a time is a good idea when you have 6 semesters there ... For that there is nothing, no emails, calls, WhatsApp, absolutely nothing. The truth is, if you enter this university, you must be ready to how badly they'll treat you, won't follow up, will make changes without notifying you, won't consult you, will lie constantly and won't look you in the eyes ... The last thing was that I asked for my monthly reimbursement since they never gave us an option that will work for us and that my transcript of matters has no cost to me since they were the ones who did not fulfill their part of the deal and Reyna dares to lie, saying that I would pass my leave, complaint, and request ... It never did, it took 3 weeks without a solution. Today I finally spoke with someone else and I hope to have my leave and papers soon. And if they do not return my money, I hope they ask their God to forgive them for all the ball of lies they say because on earth they are going to turn off. In the end, do not waste your money and time, it's not worth it.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
