Universidad Anáhuac vs Universidad Tecnológica de Nogales - UTN vs Centro de Estudios Universitarios del Nuevo Occidente - CEUNO vs Universidad del Desarrollo Profesional - UNIDEP vs Instituto Tecnológico de Nogales - ITN

Side-by-side comparison from 39 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Tecnológica de Nogales - UTN (5.00)
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 0/2 categories
Universidad Tecnológica de Nogales - UTN: wins 0/2 categories
Centro de Estudios Universitarios del Nuevo Occidente - CEUNO: wins 0/2 categories
Universidad del Desarrollo Profesional - UNIDEP: wins 1/2 categories
Instituto Tecnológico de Nogales - ITN: wins 1/2 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/2 categories
Ironhack: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best for: Engineering & Technology, Social Sciences, Business & Management
Best for: Engineering & Technology
Best for: Arts & Humanities, Life Sciences & Medicine, Social Sciences
Best for: Engineering & Technology, Life Sciences & Medicine, Social Sciences
Best for: Engineering & Technology
Best for: Engineering & Technology, Life Sciences & Medicine, Natural Sciences & Mathematics
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best for: Engineering & Technology, Business & Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Location
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.41
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
4.59
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.63
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Value
4.63
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
4.66
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities
  • +High-quality teaching and academic flexibility
  • +Flexible scheduling options
  • +Adequate and complete study plans, skill development
  • +Helpful teamwork and real-world preparation
  • +Trained and specialized teachers

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent teachers and engaging learning opportunities.

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations cause student frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of transparency create confusion and dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive administrative burden and poor management.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant course content.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

This university presents a uniform performance across all evaluated aspects, with no standout strengths or weaknesses noted. All categories, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, received identical scores. The consistent ratings suggest a consistent, albeit unexceptional, experience across the board.

Overall, this university received identical ratings of zero across all surveyed categories, indicating a uniform lack of positive reception in every aspect. There are no discernible strongest or weakest areas, as all facets of the institution appear equally unrated or critically deficient. The provided data suggests a universally unaccommodating or non-existent status for facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for its professors, location, internationality, and value. Student life also scores highly, indicating a vibrant campus experience. However, facilities and accommodation received more moderate ratings, suggesting these could be areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

The single review is overwhelmingly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. The reviewer highlighted strong educational quality and flexible academic schedules. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 4/5, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise the adequate and complete study plans that develop individual skills and teamwork. There is minimal negative feedback, representing approximately 0% of all reviews.

Nothing to show

This university has a 4/5 average rating, with all feedback being positive. The single review highlights good teachers and learning opportunities. However, it also notes a recurring theme of dirty bathrooms.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Rating distribution
5★
67%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
4★
39%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
3★
3%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
Most useful review
Featured

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close