Universidad Tecnológica de Nogales - UTN vs Centro de Estudios Universitarios del Nuevo Occidente - CEUNO vs Universidad del Desarrollo Profesional - UNIDEP vs Instituto Tecnológico de Nogales - ITN vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris

Side-by-side comparison from 15 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Tecnológica de Nogales - UTN (5.00)
Universidad Tecnológica de Nogales - UTN: wins 0/2 categories
Centro de Estudios Universitarios del Nuevo Occidente - CEUNO: wins 0/2 categories
Universidad del Desarrollo Profesional - UNIDEP: wins 1/2 categories
Instituto Tecnológico de Nogales - ITN: wins 1/2 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 0/2 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/2 categories
Ironhack: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Mechanical Engineer
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
3.00
4.56
Not rated
5.00
Location
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
5.00
4.78
Not rated
5.00
Professors
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
5.00
4.67
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
4.67
Not rated
3.00
Student life
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Value
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
5.00
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
3.22
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality teaching and academic flexibility
  • +Flexible scheduling options
  • +Adequate and complete study plans, skill development
  • +Helpful teamwork and real-world preparation
  • +Trained and specialized teachers

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent teachers and engaging learning opportunities.
  • +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
  • +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
  • +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations cause student frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of transparency create confusion and dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive administrative burden and poor management.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant course content.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
Rating summary
What students say

This university presents a uniform performance across all evaluated aspects, with no standout strengths or weaknesses noted. All categories, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, received identical scores. The consistent ratings suggest a consistent, albeit unexceptional, experience across the board.

Overall, this university received identical ratings of zero across all surveyed categories, indicating a uniform lack of positive reception in every aspect. There are no discernible strongest or weakest areas, as all facets of the institution appear equally unrated or critically deficient. The provided data suggests a universally unaccommodating or non-existent status for facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for its professors, location, internationality, and value. Student life also scores highly, indicating a vibrant campus experience. However, facilities and accommodation received more moderate ratings, suggesting these could be areas for potential improvement.

This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The single review is overwhelmingly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. The reviewer highlighted strong educational quality and flexible academic schedules. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 4/5, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise the adequate and complete study plans that develop individual skills and teamwork. There is minimal negative feedback, representing approximately 0% of all reviews.

Nothing to show

This university has a 4/5 average rating, with all feedback being positive. The single review highlights good teachers and learning opportunities. However, it also notes a recurring theme of dirty bathrooms.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
0%
0%
0%
67%
0%
50%
4★
0%
100%
0%
100%
33%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close