Linköping University - LU vs Universidad Politécnica Territorial De Los Altos Mirandinos - UPTAMCA vs New York College European and American Education - NYC vs University of Rijeka - UNIRI vs Universidad Nacional de Loja - Unl

Side-by-side comparison from 37 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences (5.00)
Linköping University - LU: wins 3/7 categories
Universidad Politécnica Territorial De Los Altos Mirandinos - UPTAMCA: wins 4/7 categories
New York College European and American Education - NYC: wins 0/7 categories
University of Rijeka - UNIRI: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Nacional de Loja - Unl: wins 0/7 categories
London School of Planning and Management - LSPM: wins 0/7 categories
Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Biomedical Science
Best programme: Occupational Health and Safety
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Bachelor of Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
4.56
4.60
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.50
Location
4.51
4.85
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
2.50
Professors
4.23
4.83
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.50
Internationality
4.33
Win
1.78
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
3.50
Student life
4.26
4.85
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.67
Not rated
2.50
Value
4.46
Win
4.05
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.50
Accommodation
4.15
Win
2.25
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and helpful faculty.
  • +Beautiful and modern campus facilities.
  • +Opportunities for interdisciplinary learning and research.
  • +Qualified and supportive teachers
  • +Quality professional development
  • +Valuable practical experience
  • +High-quality, multicultural education
  • +Excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong business programs

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive, clear teaching and practical learning
  • +Encouraging, participatory environment
  • +Positive overall experience

Nothing to show

  • +Comprehensive and quality medical education
  • +Strong foundation in theoretical and practical skills
  • +Affordable education
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a significant problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues neglect several careers.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of attention to certain academic areas are problematic.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty and staff are major concerns.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a consistent complaint.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations from instructors and the institution are common grievances.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both receiving top marks. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also highly rated, indicating a vibrant and globally connected campus environment. While still strong, **Value** and **Professors** received slightly lower scores, representing areas for potential refinement. **Accommodations** were rated the lowest among the surveyed categories.

This institution excels in several key areas, particularly its location and student life, both rated at an impressive 4.85. Professors also receive outstanding scores (4.825). However, significant challenges are evident in accommodation and internationality, with ratings of 2.25 and 1.775 respectively. The university offers good value at 4.05 and solid facilities at 4.6.

This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.

Nothing to show

This institution garners strong marks in several key areas, notably receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, and location. Student life and value also received positive ratings. However, accommodation and internationality represent the weakest aspects, with scores of 3 out of a possible 5.

Nothing to show

An analysis of university ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive outlook. The institution excels in **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality**, all scoring a strong 3.5. **Accomodation** and overall **Value** also received solid marks at 3.0 and 3.5 respectively. In contrast, **Location** and **Student Life** represent the weaker areas, both receiving a lower score of 2.5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly all 17 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.35/5. Students frequently praise the beautiful campus, helpful faculty, and supportive academic environment, noting ample opportunities for personal and professional growth.

Approximately 70% of reviews are positive, highlighting good teachers and skill development. A smaller percentage of feedback mentions administrative issues and neglect of some programs. The average rating is 3.92/5.

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.

Nothing to show

The university receives largely positive feedback, with ~33% of reviews being highly positive. Students appreciate supportive teachers and a conducive learning environment, though some note room for improvement in organization. There is no negative feedback recorded.

Nothing to show

Both reviews are highly positive, giving the university a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students commend the quality education and experienced faculty.

Rating distribution
5★
53%
46%
0%
0%
33%
0%
100%
4★
29%
23%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
18%
15%
0%
100%
67%
0%
0%
2★
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
LiU is the best swedish uni for intl students

The campus culture is amazing. I have heard horror stories from other international students that its hard for them to find friends and have a social life in Sweden. But its not the case here. I have had some of the best moments of my life in this uni. Campus life is the best here in my opinion

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close