Canakkale 18 March University - COMU vs Universidad Politécnica Territorial De Los Altos Mirandinos - UPTAMCA vs University of Insubria - UNINSUBRIA vs Eurasian Management and Administration School vs Khoja Akhmet Yassawi University
Side-by-side comparison from 84 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent campus location and facilities
- +Supportive and helpful professors
- +Well-organized and comprehensive courses
- +Qualified and supportive teachers
- +Quality professional development
- +Valuable practical experience
- +High-quality, competent professors and good teaching
- +Varied academic proposals and internship opportunities
- +Positive learning environment and valuable student experiences
- +Practical, results-driven business education
- +Actionable assignments and real-world application
- +Experienced professors and industry insights
- +Great campus and facilities
- +Endless opportunities and unforgettable experiences
- +Lifelong friendships
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues neglect several careers.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of attention to certain academic areas are problematic.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of engaging and relevant course content is frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Ineffective teaching and a lack of academic support are major concerns.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university garners its highest marks for **Location**, boasting a score of 4.57. **Professors** are also highly regarded, receiving a rating of 4.29. Conversely, **Internationality** is the area with the lowest score, at 3.5. Other aspects like Facilities, Accommodation, and Value fall in the mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not universally outstanding performance.
This institution excels in several key areas, particularly its location and student life, both rated at an impressive 4.85. Professors also receive outstanding scores (4.825). However, significant challenges are evident in accommodation and internationality, with ratings of 2.25 and 1.775 respectively. The university offers good value at 4.05 and solid facilities at 4.6.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its academic offerings, with an exceptional rating for Professors (4.45). Location (4.2) and Student Life (3.975) also garnered positive feedback. However, Internationality stands out as the weakest area, receiving a considerably lower score (2.925). Facilities and Value are rated moderately well, while Accomodation scores are a bit lower.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in **Value** and **Internationality**, both scoring very high. **Professors** also receive a strong rating, indicating high academic quality. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** are all rated solidly, suggesting a good overall student experience. The lowest-rated area, though still positive, is **Location**.
This institution receives outstanding marks in several key areas, notably Facilities, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value, all earning a perfect 5. Professors are rated highly at 4, representing its strongest performance alongside the excellent student experience and resources. The university also scores well for Location, with a solid 4. Its weakest area, relatively speaking, is its faculty, though still a strong rating.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.19/5, approximately 93% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university's well-organized courses, supportive professors, and beautiful, functional campus. Some note that accommodation is expensive.
Approximately 70% of reviews are positive, highlighting good teachers and skill development. A smaller percentage of feedback mentions administrative issues and neglect of some programs. The average rating is 3.92/5.
With an average rating of 4/5, ~80% of feedback is positive. Students highlight competent professors, good teaching, and varied program offerings, including internships. Some mention bureaucracy as a minor concern.
With an average rating of 4.82/5 from 49 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highly praise the school's practical, results-driven business education and real-world application. Modules and assignments are frequently highlighted for their immediate applicability.
With a 4/5 average rating and no negative feedback, this university is highly regarded. Students praise the campus and facilities, with one noting endless opportunities and an unforgettable experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
If you’re looking for a practical, results-driven business education that makes a real impact, the Eurasian Management & Administration School (EMAS) is an excellent choice. EMAS stands out as one of the strongest business schools in Central and Eastern Europe, offering MBA, Executive MBA, DBA, and business coaching programs that focus on real-world implementation and strategic thinking. DBA at EMAS transformed my leadership and boosted my Business vision, it’s a Strategic DBA, that gives real business impact. The DBA sharpened my executive edge. In all it’s a Practical DBA, great support, real impact.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show