Universidad Nacional Abierta - UNA vs Universidad Experimental de Las Artes - UNEARTE vs Universidad Monteávila vs Universidad Alejandro de Humboldt - UAH vs Instituto Universitario Tecnológico Américo Vespucio - IUTAV

Side-by-side comparison from 16 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Nacional Abierta - UNA: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Experimental de Las Artes - UNEARTE: wins 1/4 categories
Universidad Monteávila: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Alejandro de Humboldt - UAH: wins 0/4 categories
Instituto Universitario Tecnológico Américo Vespucio - IUTAV: wins 0/4 categories
Colegio Universitario de Administración y Mercadeo - CUAM: wins 0/4 categories
Instituto Universitario De Diseño Las Mercedes - IUDLM: wins 3/4 categories
Category ratings
Facilities
3.98
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Location
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
3.23
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.50
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Value
3.73
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
3.50
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Flexible and distance learning
  • +Accessible and inclusive admission
  • +Strong academic support and quality education
  • +Focus on artistic preparation and free experimentation
  • +Emphasis on community and social artistic experience
  • +Offers diverse degree options for artistic readiness
  • +Excellent teachers and integral formation
  • +High academic demand and professional preparation
  • +Supportive campus environment
  • +Excellent academic programs and dedicated professors
  • +Strong career preparation and professional development
  • +Opportunities for practical application and societal contribution

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging and supportive instructors
  • +Practical learning opportunities and relevant skills development
  • +Positive campus atmosphere and student community
  • +Engaging and challenging academic programs
  • +Creative and collaborative learning environment
  • +Focus on ecological and sustainable design
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and outdated curriculum are a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Students express dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.
  • -Poor communication and unclear instructions.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Lack of support and responsiveness from staff.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and poor communication are recurring complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor quality of teachers and push towards ineffective online classes
  • -Lack of access to necessary technology for online learning
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching or relevant curriculum is a common complaint.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in **Location** and **Student Life**, both earning perfect scores. **Facilities** also rank highly, indicating a well-equipped campus. Conversely, **Professors** received the lowest rating, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other aspects like **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall within a moderate range.

This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both receiving a perfect score of 5. It also performs well in **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, each rated at 4. **Location** and **Professors** are also strong points, each earning a 4. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with standout strengths in its physical environment and student experience.

This institution presents a uniform rating across all assessed aspects, with no standout strengths or weaknesses. All surveyed categories—facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value—received identical scores. The consistent feedback suggests an even performance across the board, without any particular area excelling or falling significantly behind.

Across all evaluated aspects, the institution presents a uniform score of zero. This indicates no particular strengths or weaknesses emerge from the provided ratings. The consistent lack of points suggests a complete absence of positive or negative feedback in the categories of facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value.

Nothing to show

This institution presents a uniform rating across all evaluated aspects, with no area distinguishing itself as a strength or weakness. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received identical scores. Consequently, no specific domain stands out as particularly positive or negative based on this data. The overall feedback indicates a consistent, albeit undifferentiated, performance across the board.

The university receives outstanding scores in several key areas, achieving a perfect 5 out of 5 for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, and Value. Its weakest area, Internationality, scored a 3 out of 5, indicating room for improvement in global engagement and diversity. Overall, the institution offers a highly rated experience across most aspects of university life.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.2/5. Students praise flexibility, time management, and the ability to study and work concurrently, citing the distance learning model and accessible educational materials.

The single review highlights strong preparation in all art areas and community participation. Free experimentation and practice in workshops are noted positively. The university fosters readiness to become an artist.

All three reviews are highly positive, contributing to a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students praise the integral education, professional preparation, highly trained teachers, and overall positive campus environment. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~74% of reviews are positive. Students praise the varied curriculum and academic level, with some suggestions for salary increases and improved student union involvement.

Nothing to show

The single review is negative, rating the university 1/5. It highlights concerns about a lack of quality teachers and the proposed shift to online classes, which is seen as impractical for many students.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight enriching experiences, engaging professors, and a fostering of creativity and collaboration, particularly within the Interior Design program with its ecological design emphasis.

Rating distribution
5★
20%
0%
100%
50%
0%
0%
100%
4★
80%
100%
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
25%
100%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close