Universidad Bolivariana de Venezuela - UBV vs Universidad Experimental de Las Artes - UNEARTE vs Instituto Universitario de Nuevas Profesiones - IUNP vs Universidad Nacional Experimental Simón Rodríguez - UNESR vs Universidad Nueva Esparta - UNE

Side-by-side comparison from 19 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Instituto Universitario De Diseño Las Mercedes - IUDLM (5.00)
Universidad Bolivariana de Venezuela - UBV: wins 0/2 categories
Universidad Experimental de Las Artes - UNEARTE: wins 0/2 categories
Instituto Universitario de Nuevas Profesiones - IUNP: wins 0/2 categories
Universidad Nacional Experimental Simón Rodríguez - UNESR: wins 0/2 categories
Universidad Nueva Esparta - UNE: wins 0/2 categories
Instituto Universitario De Diseño Las Mercedes - IUDLM: wins 2/2 categories
Design Institute of Caracas - IDC: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Arts
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Interior Design
Best programme: Industrial Design
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
5.00
Not rated
3.75
4.00
5.00
3.00
Location
4.00
4.00
Not rated
3.43
5.00
5.00
4.00
Professors
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.13
2.00
5.00
Win
3.00
Internationality
4.00
4.00
Not rated
3.88
1.00
3.00
4.00
Student life
4.00
5.00
Not rated
4.00
1.00
5.00
3.00
Value
4.00
5.00
Not rated
3.63
1.00
5.00
5.00
Accommodation
4.00
4.00
Not rated
2.57
3.00
5.00
Win
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Highly qualified teachers and pleasant student environment
  • +Good facilities and safety
  • +Easy access to university
  • +Focus on artistic preparation and free experimentation
  • +Emphasis on community and social artistic experience
  • +Offers diverse degree options for artistic readiness

Nothing to show

  • +Dynamic and accessible educational environment with committed professors.
  • +Diverse and flexible academic programs.
  • +Encouragement of creativity, research, and social commitment.
  • +Relevant, advanced career programs
  • +Professional development and expertise
  • +Conducive study environment
  • +Engaging and challenging academic programs
  • +Creative and collaborative learning environment
  • +Focus on ecological and sustainable design
  • +Passionate and expert instructors
  • +Challenging pace for beginners
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Students express dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor academic organization and lack of essential resources like laboratories.
  • -Frequent absence of teaching staff due to low salaries and poor compensation.
  • -University unpreparedness for complex degree programs.
  • -Insufficient qualified teaching staff leads to underqualified instructors.
  • -Curriculum reduction omits essential subjects.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching or relevant curriculum is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major problem.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of support from instructors are frequently cited.
Rating summary
What students say

Demonstrating a consistently high performance, this institution received uniform scores of 4 out of 5 across all evaluated aspects. No specific category emerged as a standout strength or weakness, with facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all achieving equal recognition. This suggests a well-rounded and uniformly positive university experience.

This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both receiving a perfect score of 5. It also performs well in **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, each rated at 4. **Location** and **Professors** are also strong points, each earning a 4. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with standout strengths in its physical environment and student experience.

Nothing to show

Overall, this university garners positive feedback across most aspects. Professors and student life stand out as particular strengths. However, accommodation received the lowest marks, indicating a significant area for improvement. The university also scored moderately well in facilities, location, internationality, and value, suggesting a generally satisfactory, though not exceptional, experience in these regards.

This institution shines in its **location**, receiving a perfect score, and demonstrates solid performance in **facilities**. However, significant weaknesses are apparent in **student life**, **internationality**, and **value**, all earning a low rating of 1. **Professors** and **accommodation** fall in the middle range, suggesting areas for development alongside the lower-scoring aspects.

The university receives outstanding scores in several key areas, achieving a perfect 5 out of 5 for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, and Value. Its weakest area, Internationality, scored a 3 out of 5, indicating room for improvement in global engagement and diversity. Overall, the institution offers a highly rated experience across most aspects of university life.

Offering a compelling proposition, this institution shines particularly brightly in **Value**, receiving a perfect score of 5. Its **Location** and **Internationality** are also strong points, both earning a 4. Conversely, **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Accommodation** all received a solid, but less impressive, rating of 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight excellent teachers and facilities, alongside a pleasant and safe environment. There is minimal negative feedback regarding administrative processes.

The single review highlights strong preparation in all art areas and community participation. Free experimentation and practice in workshops are noted positively. The university fosters readiness to become an artist.

Nothing to show

90% of reviewers praise the dynamic environment, quality professors, and diverse programs. One reviewer noted concerns about professor feedback and missing faculty, representing 10% of feedback.

The university receives generally positive feedback, with ~75% of reviews being highly favorable. Some minor concerns were noted about limited transportation access and teaching staff qualifications.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight enriching experiences, engaging professors, and a fostering of creativity and collaboration, particularly within the Interior Design program with its ecological design emphasis.

With a single review, this university boasts a 4/5 average rating and ~100% positive feedback. The one review highlights knowledgeable, passionate instructors but notes a steep learning curve for new students.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
0%
60%
50%
100%
0%
4★
100%
100%
0%
30%
25%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
25%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Vet

The Simón Rodríguez University had many shortcomings in terms of the study and organization to teach the degree in veterinary medicine, there were not even laboratories and the teaching staff was very infrequent due to the very low salary that the teachers received for their work, the university did not I was prepared to take on a career of that magnitude.

Not the best moment for this university

At this moment, this is not the best university to study on Venezuela, it doesn't have enough teachers for all the subjects, because of that, there are students teaching, they are not even graduated. Also they reduced the career from 5 to 4 years, that wasn't good because now we don't see some important subjects that help on the field of engineering. I don't recommend it at this moment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close