Université de Mulhouse Haute Alsace - UHA vs Ivan Franko National University of Lviv - LNU vs Lviv Polytechnic National University - LPNU vs Ukrainian Culinary University - UCU vs Banking University Lviv Institute - Libs Ubs

Side-by-side comparison from 34 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Université de Mulhouse Haute Alsace - UHA: wins 0/6 categories
Ivan Franko National University of Lviv - LNU: wins 0/6 categories
Lviv Polytechnic National University - LPNU: wins 1/6 categories
Ukrainian Culinary University - UCU: wins 0/6 categories
Banking University Lviv Institute - Libs Ubs: wins 0/6 categories
UCU Business School: wins 1/6 categories
General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University: wins 4/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Chemistry
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Best programme: Aviation Law and Professional Pilot License
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.33
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Location
Not rated
4.67
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Professors
Not rated
3.33
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.67
Win
Internationality
Not rated
2.33
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.33
Student life
Not rated
2.67
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.67
Win
Value
Not rated
3.33
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.67
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Quality education and practical skills
  • +Supportive environment for student initiatives
  • +Strong academic reputation and historical significance
  • +High-quality education and practical experience
  • +Vibrant student life and extracurricular activities
  • +Delicious food and modern facilities
  • +Flexible learning paths and community focus
  • +Emphasis on science and innovation
  • +Strong foundational values
  • +Excellent facilities and practical learning opportunities.
  • +Engaging and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Positive overall study experience.
  • +Engaging activities and legitimate university experience
  • +Quality education and valuable attainment
  • +Amazing sports opportunities
  • +High-quality education and diverse degree programs
  • +Government-maintained standards and easy city accessibility
  • +Excellent facilities, natural environment, and gender equality
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Poor course organization and unclear communication regarding schedules and exams.
  • -Incompetent instructors and significant issues with academic integrity and potential corruption.
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are common complaints.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum design lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources are often criticized.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support negatively impacts the student experience.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a frequent complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -A lack of necessary resources and support hinders learning.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
  • -Inefficient administrative and management processes cause frustration.
  • -Lack of engagement and accessibility from instructors is a recurring complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment
  • -Limited career support and internship opportunities
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This institution shows a strong showing in its **location**, earning a high rating. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest score among the surveyed categories. Other areas, including facilities, professors, and value, fall within a moderate range. Student life also scored lower, while accommodation received a favorable rating.

This institution garners excellent marks for its prime **location (5)** and solid performance in **facilities (4)** and **value (4)**. However, areas like **student life (3)** and **accommodation (3)** received more moderate evaluations, indicating potential for improvement. Internationality and professor quality both scored at a respectable 3.67.

An analysis of the university's ratings reveals a consistent performance across all surveyed categories, with no specific areas standing out as particularly strong or weak. Each aspect, from facilities and professors to location and student life, received an identical rating of zero. This suggests a uniform level of perceived quality, or lack thereof, across the entire university experience. Accommodations, internationality, and value also reflect this consistent scoring.

With consistently average ratings across all surveyed categories, this institution presents a uniform experience. No specific area stands out as a particular strength or weakness. The institution appears to offer a neutral environment in terms of facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value.

This institution demonstrates a remarkably consistent performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest asset with a perfect score. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and value all receive solid marks, indicating a well-rounded educational experience. There are no significantly weak areas identified, reflecting a high level of satisfaction across most aspects.

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Value, this institution excels in providing top-tier amenities and a strong return on investment. Professors and Student Life also receive excellent scores, indicating a high-quality academic experience and vibrant campus community. However, Accomodation presents the weakest area, suggesting room for improvement in student housing options. Internationality and Location are rated positively, contributing to a well-rounded university profile.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

About 68% of reviews are positive, highlighting good educational quality, opportunities for goals, and strong traditions. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions disorganized study processes and issues with some professors.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~94% favorable). Students praise high-level teachers, practical work, diverse extracurricular activities, and excellent education. A few mention minor issues with facilities and administrative speed.

The single review provided is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This indicates a strong satisfaction with the university's unique approach to learning, focus on values, and emphasis on personal development and innovation.

With one review, the university is rated 4/5 stars. This feedback is approximately 100% positive, highlighting good facilities, practical classes, and exchange program opportunities. Some professors were noted as less effective, but many were praised.

With one review, the university receives a 4/5 rating. This student found activities legitimate and sports, like basketball, amazing. No negative feedback was reported.

All three reviews are highly positive, giving a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students highlight quality education, degree programs, and government standards. The university's location and ample space with nature are also appreciated.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
27%
33%
100%
0%
0%
100%
4★
0%
41%
33%
0%
100%
100%
0%
3★
0%
23%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close