Universidad Marítima del Caribe - UMC vs Symbiosis International University vs Northern Virginia Community College - NOVA vs Weber State University vs IBBI University

Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: SMKN 6 Yogyakarta (5.00)
Universidad Marítima del Caribe - UMC: wins 0/4 categories
Symbiosis International University: wins 0/4 categories
Northern Virginia Community College - NOVA: wins 0/4 categories
Weber State University: wins 0/4 categories
IBBI University: wins 0/4 categories
Semarang State University: wins 0/4 categories
SMKN 6 Yogyakarta: wins 4/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration and Bachelor of Legislative Law
Fairfax, Virginia, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Ogden, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
medan, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Semarang, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Tourism
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.33
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
Not rated
4.31
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Professors
Not rated
4.38
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
Not rated
4.06
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
Not rated
4.63
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
Not rated
4.13
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
Not rated
4.13
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Specialized maritime engineering program
  • +Supportive faculty and focus on personal development
  • +Opportunities for exploration through diverse subjects and extracurriculars
  • +Well-managed balance between academics and activities
  • +Flexible class modes and pace options
  • +Accessible and affordable course materials
  • +Supportive resources for job searching

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Hands-on practical learning
  • +Supportive and helpful teachers
  • +Good facilities and resources
Cons
  • -Lack of administrative support and unclear management communication cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Inconsistent or ineffective teaching methods and curriculum delivery are prevalent concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent concerns.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major concern.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are frequent frustrations.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniformly neutral profile across all evaluated aspects. Areas of strength and weakness are not discernible, as facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received identical scores. The assessment indicates no particular standout features or significant shortcomings.

Students have provided a comprehensive evaluation of the university, with **Student Life** emerging as the strongest area, receiving a score of 4.625. **Accomodation** and **Value** are rated equally at 4.125, representing the areas with the lowest scores. Other categories such as Facilities, Professors, Location, and Internationality all fall within a strong range between 4.0625 and 4.375, indicating a generally positive student experience.

Remarkable scores characterize this institution, with perfect marks awarded for its prime location and excellent accommodation. Professors and international student experiences are also highly praised. While facilities and student life are rated strongly at a 4, the value proposition stands out, achieving a perfect score, indicating a highly recommended experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution receives perfect scores across all evaluated metrics. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a 5 out of 5. There are no discernible weak areas; every aspect surveyed meets the highest possible standard.

Reviews summary
Highlights

This university receives a 4/5 average rating, with ~100% of feedback being positive. The positive sentiment highlights a selective range of careers, specifically mentioning Maritime Engineering as a strong program.

With a 4.25/5 average rating from 16 reviews, ~94% are positive, highlighting good faculty and well-managed programs. Negative feedback is minimal, representing approximately 0% of feedback.

With a 4.5/5 average rating from 2 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight flexible class modes and accessible resources as key benefits. There are no negative reviews.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 average rating. It highlights extensive learning, enjoyable hands-on practice, and helpful, nice teachers.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
31%
50%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
100%
63%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close