Universitat de Girona vs Lesya Ukrainka East European National University vs Lutsk Polytechnic National University - NTU vs University of Tehran - UT vs Wright State University

Side-by-side comparison from 232 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM (4.70)
Universitat de Girona: wins 0/7 categories
Lesya Ukrainka East European National University: wins 2/7 categories
Lutsk Polytechnic National University - NTU: wins 0/7 categories
University of Tehran - UT: wins 1/7 categories
Wright State University: wins 0/7 categories
MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM: wins 3/7 categories
University of Namibia - UNAM: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Science
Dayton, Ohio, United States
4.10
Read more reviews
42 reviews
×
Best programme: Physical Education
Best programme: MBA
Best programme: Education
Category ratings
Facilities
4.13
4.00
Not rated
4.17
4.34
5.00
Win
3.83
Location
4.27
Not rated
Not rated
3.70
4.31
4.50
4.60
Win
Professors
4.22
4.00
Not rated
4.44
Win
4.43
4.33
4.13
Internationality
3.87
4.00
Not rated
3.28
4.14
4.67
Win
4.38
Student life
4.29
4.00
Not rated
3.79
4.19
4.67
Win
4.43
Value
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.07
4.38
4.67
4.50
Accommodation
3.88
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.62
4.50
4.67
4.38
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging campus environment and strong sense of community
  • +High-quality academics and dedicated, supportive faculty
  • +Excellent balance of academic rigor and vibrant social life
  • +Highly skilled and professional faculty.
  • +Abundant opportunities for research and language practice.
  • +Engaging extracurricular activities and events.

Nothing to show

  • +Expert, knowledgeable faculty and rigorous academic programs
  • +Prestigious reputation and rich intellectual environment
  • +Vibrant student life and historic, inspiring campus
  • +Welcoming campus atmosphere and helpful faculty/staff
  • +Diverse programs, activities, and opportunities for involvement
  • +Inclusive environment and supportive community
  • +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
  • +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
  • +Real-world application and career preparation
  • +Strong academic reputation and globally recognized degree.
  • +Diverse and inclusive campus environment with various student activities.
  • +Focus on practical skills and preparing students for careers.
Cons
  • -Uncaring and unmotivated instructors are a recurring problem.
  • -Repetitive campus life offers little variety.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and lack of support.
  • -Outdated and inadequate facilities, with complaints about cleanliness and functionality.
  • -Overpriced tuition relative to the quality of education and resources provided.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and unclear policies.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources, such as old equipment and insufficient technology.
  • -Ineffective teaching or curriculum that is not engaging or relevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major drawbacks.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a significant concern.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsive staff frustrate students.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates a strong showing in student-focused aspects, with Student Life receiving the highest marks at 4.29 and Location also performing well at 4.27. Professors are also highly rated at 4.22. Areas for improvement include Accomodation and Internationality, which are the lowest rated categories, at 3.88 and 3.87 respectively. Facilities and Value are rated solidly in the mid-range.

This institution excels in accommodations and value, both receiving perfect scores. Its facilities, professors, student life, and internationality are also highly regarded, each earning a 4-star rating. The university's weakest area, however, is its location, which received a score of 0, indicating a significant drawback in this aspect.

Nothing to show

Academic and student experiences are generally well-regarded, with professors earning the highest rating at 4.44. Facilities also score well at 4.17, and value is rated at 4.07. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, which received the lowest score at 3.28, followed by accommodation at 3.62. Student life and location are moderately rated, sitting around the 3.7 mark.

This institution receives high marks across most aspects, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** with a perfect score. **Professors** are also highly rated. The **Student Life** category shows the lowest score among the surveyed areas, though it remains a positive rating. Other areas like Facilities, Location, Internationality, and Value are all strong performers.

This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.

An analysis of university ratings reveals a strong showing, with **Location** standing out as the highest-rated aspect. Students also report very positive experiences with **Student Life**, **Value**, and **Accomodation** / **Internationality**, which share identical high scores. The **Professors** also received excellent feedback. Conversely, **Facilities** garnered the lowest, though still respectable, rating.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly all reviews praise the beautiful campus and positive social atmosphere, with ~74% highlighting excellent teachers and academic/social balance. A single review noted some teachers lack engagement.

All 5 reviews are positive, averaging 4/5 stars. Students praise skilled teachers and research opportunities, especially within the English and French Philology department. Minor points include improving heating and reducing photocopy costs.

Nothing to show

~100% of reviews are positive, with students frequently praising learned content, knowledgeable professors, and the institution's prestige. A few mention infrastructure challenges or slow administration.

All 42 reviews are positive, with ~100% praising helpful faculty/staff, enjoyable campus atmosphere, and diverse activities. The average rating is 4.12/5.

Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.

Approximately 88% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic offerings, a safe environment, and diverse activities. No negative feedback was reported. The average rating is 4/5.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
0%
0%
15%
12%
67%
25%
4★
55%
100%
0%
70%
88%
33%
50%
3★
9%
0%
100%
15%
0%
0%
25%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close