Mary Immaculate College - MIC vs Dublin City University - DCU vs University of Limerick - UL vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Kemmy Business School - KBS
Side-by-side comparison from 161 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Close-knit community and personal lecturer relationships
- +Strong sense of togetherness and unity among students
- +Excellent teaching programs and student support
- +Dedicated and supportive lecturers
- +Welcoming and friendly student community
- +Positive and smooth overall university experience
- +Emphasis on practical, real-world skills and career preparation.
- +Welcoming atmosphere and strong sense of community for all students.
- +Excellent lecturers and dedicated academic support.
- +Industry-relevant courses for job readiness
- +Positive learning atmosphere and helpful, knowledgeable professors
- +Valuable international exposure and personal/professional development
- +Expert faculty and supportive environment
- +Modern facilities and accommodation
- +Supportive guidance throughout the student journey
- +Practical, skill-focused education with industry-experienced professors
- +Affordable programs and welcoming community atmosphere
- +Supportive and accessible faculty
- +Well-structured and accommodating courses
- +Welcoming and convenient campus environment
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and responsiveness from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are major drawbacks.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and insufficient support hinder learning.
- -Poor faculty engagement and guidance on career prospects and research.
- -Lack of quality and value despite seemingly lower fees.
- -Poor quality education and value for money.
- -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication and transparency are lacking from leadership.
- -Lack of essential university facilities and student support services
- -Poor teaching quality and insufficient practical application
- -Inadequate building maintenance and uncomfortable conditions
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Ineffective administrative and management practices cause frustration.
- -Lack of student support and career services is a significant concern.
This institution shows a stark contrast in its ratings. It excels significantly in **Professors** and **Value**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, its **Internationality** is a clear weak point, scoring only one. Facilities, Location, and Student Life also received low marks, indicating areas for considerable improvement. Accommodations sit in the middle with a moderate rating.
This university garners favorable ratings across most aspects, with **Professors** and **Value** standing out as the strongest areas, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also receive high marks, exceeding 4.2. **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are well-regarded, with scores around 4.0 and 4.1 respectively. The **Location** is the weakest performing category, though still respectable at 3.75.
Considerable strengths emerge in teaching quality and student experience, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.3 and Student Life at 4.23. The university also scores well in Facilities (4.2) and Internationality (4.21). Location is positively regarded at 4.01. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, scoring 3.95, while Value is also a strong point at 4.34.
This institution garners high marks in several key areas. Its Facilities, Professors, and Value are all rated consistently well at 3.83. Internationality stands out as a significant strength with a perfect score of 4. Conversely, Accomodation is a weaker point, rated at 3.2, with Location also receiving a comparatively lower score of 3.33. Student Life falls in the middle with a rating of 3.5.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates a consistent and strong performance. Each aspect, from facilities and professors to student life and internationality, has earned a rating of 4. The university excels uniformly, with no single area standing out significantly above others, nor any area identified as a weakness. Its balanced approach suggests a well-rounded educational experience.
Academic and international aspects of the university are highly praised, with Professors and Internationality both receiving a strong 4.29 rating. Location also scores well at 4.17. The university's weakest area is Accomodation, which received a lower score of 2.88. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a moderate range, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside its strengths.
This university presents a generally positive profile, with particularly strong ratings for its professors at 4.5. Other highly-rated aspects include facilities, student life, accommodation, and internationality, all scoring a solid 4. The location is the weakest area, receiving a 3.5 rating, though overall value is also rated favorably at 4.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~75%), highlighting a strong sense of community, close lecturer-student relationships, and excellent teaching. Some mention the college's compact size and limited on-site facilities.
With a 4.49 average rating from 61 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent lecturers, a welcoming community, and a positive academic experience.
With ~99% of 80 reviews being positive, students highlight a lively community, excellent facilities, and practical learning. A single negative review criticized career prospects and faculty awareness.
With a 3.67/5 average, most reviews are positive (~74%), highlighting personal growth, industry-relevant courses, and a good learning atmosphere. One negative review (~16.7%) criticizes the school as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews praise the vibrant academic community, state-of-the-art amenities, and expert faculty. ~100% of feedback is positive, with no negative reviews recorded.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive guidance, practical learning, and friendly staff. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions a lack of facilities and career support.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, ~0% negative feedback indicates a highly positive student experience. Students praise the welcoming atmosphere, easy navigation of classes and campus, and friendly student-friendly location. Responsiveness of staff and well-structured courses are also highlighted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am currently studying a Masters in International Entrepreneurship Management this programme develops entrepreneurial creativity, awareness and specialist knowledge to help establish, manage and grow innovative new ventures across a variety of industry settings, incorporating a range of in-company projects to give ‘real world’ experience. Participants explore their own entrepreneurial potential and prepare an investor-ready business plan. I have always wanted to start my own business and this programme equipped me with the tools and skills to do this. Throughout the programme, we were able to work with real-life businesses and consult for them on a regular basis. For example in a module called international business consulting we worked for one of the biggest PPE distributors in the EU. We developed a market entry strategy for the company Irema and outlined how they could advance into the US market. Furthermore, for the final year project, we had to work with a small enterprise and establish a two-year commercialisation plan for them. This was really great fun and gave a practical experience that you wouldn’t be able to get in any other programme.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
