Universidad Sergio Arboleda vs Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG vs Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia - UNAD vs Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC vs Fundación Universitaria San Martín - SANMARTIN
Side-by-side comparison from 29 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Passionate professors and vibrant learning environment
- +Modern facilities and academic opportunities
- +Strong career support and personal development
- +Excellent faculty and academic level
- +Relevant and practical learning experiences
- +Attractive and accessible campus locations
- +Supportive and caring staff offering detailed explanations.
- +Emphasis on self-reliance and critical thinking in learning.
- +Flexible online learning options with advanced technological resources.
- +Strong social and community focus
- +Early patient contact and practical skill development
- +Student voice and equitable treatment
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Lack of academic rigor and unchallenging coursework.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major concern.
- -Communication and organization are frequently criticized as poor.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.56, and in its **student life**, scoring 4.44. **Facilities** also fare well with a rating of 4.11. Conversely, the **accommodation** category shows the lowest score at 3.89, indicating it as a potential area for improvement. Ratings for professors, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-range.
This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.
This institution receives consistently high marks, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring above 4.5. **Value** and **Internationality** are the lowest-rated areas, though still solid at 4.0. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, and Location also demonstrate strong performance, with ratings around 4.3 to 4.4, indicating a well-rounded educational experience.
Overall, the university receives commendable ratings. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Professors, both scoring 4.5 and 4.625 respectively, closely followed by Location and Value. Student Life and Accomodation are rated well at 4. The university's weakest area is Internationality, with a score of 3.875, though this still indicates a generally positive reception.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
About 56% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic opportunities, professors, and growth. A small portion (11.1%) of negative feedback mentions a lack of academic challenge and lazy professors.
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.
Students report a highly positive experience (~100% of feedback), praising strong organizational support, attentive staff, and engaging learning methods. Some minor navigation and response time issues were noted.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight meaningful experiences, practical patient contact, and a strong social focus. Some mention timetable distribution issues.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show