Universidad Nacional de Colombia vs Universidad Manuela Beltrán - UMB vs Escuela de Administración de Negocios - EAN vs Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina - Areandina vs Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB
Side-by-side comparison from 53 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High academic quality and knowledgeable professors.
- +Personal and professional growth opportunities.
- +Positive and supportive campus environment.
- +High-quality, accredited programs with well-equipped facilities and practical application of knowledge.
- +Emphasis on creativity, research, and instilling strong values for responsible and ethical professionals.
- +Opportunities for diverse practical experiences and national/international student exchange programs.
- +Strong focus on entrepreneurship integrated across programs.
- +Diverse language options and specialized career paths within Modern Languages.
- +High-quality teaching, student well-being, and administrative improvements.
- +Quality programs and affordable tuition
- +Practical experience and real-world application
- +Career advancement opportunities and international agreements
- +High academic quality and relevant programs
- +Strong English language focus
- +Blend of nature and academic facilities
- +Strong social and community focus
- +Early patient contact and practical skill development
- +Student voice and equitable treatment
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Inconsistent course quality and teaching standards are a common complaint.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of career services and job placement support.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are also significant drawbacks.
- -Inflexible curriculum and teaching methods are a recurring point of dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are recurring complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as inflexible or uninspiring.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major concern.
- -Communication and organization are frequently criticized as poor.
Nothing to show
This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly for its Location and Student Life, both approaching a perfect score. Professors also receive near-perfect ratings. While Internationality and Value are strong, Facilities are rated moderately well. The weakest area, however, is Accomodation, indicating a need for improvement in this category.
This institution boasts impressive strengths in several key areas. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received excellent ratings of 4. Professors also garnered positive feedback with a score of 4. However, facilities represent a weaker point, scoring a 3, while the location received no rating.
This institution garners excellent marks, with professors and location standing out as particularly strong areas, both receiving a perfect score. Student life and value also score highly, indicating a positive overall experience. Facilities and accommodation are rated well, while internationality is a solid but comparatively lower-scoring aspect.
The university receives exceptionally strong feedback in several key areas, with facilities, professors, location, and student life all earning near-perfect scores. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present as comparatively weaker aspects, scoring notably lower. The value for money is also rated favorably, though not as highly as the top-tier categories.
Excelling in its facilities and international appeal, this institution garners top marks in those areas. Student life, professor quality, and location also receive strong positive feedback, indicating a well-rounded experience. However, the university's value for money is notably lower, standing out as its weakest aspect.
Overall, the university receives commendable ratings. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Professors, both scoring 4.5 and 4.625 respectively, closely followed by Location and Value. Student Life and Accomodation are rated well at 4. The university's weakest area is Internationality, with a score of 3.875, though this still indicates a generally positive reception.
Nothing to show
With a 4.75/5 average, ~100% of 32 reviews are positive. Students praise excellent academic quality, highly qualified professors, and a supportive, professional environment. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.25/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight the high quality physiotherapy program, creative curriculum, and emphasis on developing responsible, dedicated professionals. Facilities and learning tools are also noted as beneficial.
With an average rating of 4/5, ~100% of student feedback is positive. Recurring themes highlight the university's focus on sustainable entrepreneurship, diverse language options within programs like Modern Languages, and quality teaching.
All reviews are positive (100%), highlighting quality study programs, affordability, and enriching experiences. Students appreciate transformative programs, skilled teachers, and practical application opportunities. The university also fosters business sector support and international specialization agreements.
With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students praise the university's strong academic quality, emphasis on English language education, and adaptation to labor needs. The natural campus environment and excellent facilities are also highlighted.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight meaningful experiences, practical patient contact, and a strong social focus. Some mention timetable distribution issues.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Ean University is one of the most socially diverse institutions you can find in Bogotá. Its guiding principle is "Sustainable Entrepreneurship"—a philosophy deeply embedded in the curriculum. Regardless of their major, every student is required to engage with this concept at some point in their academic journey. I am currently enrolled in the Modern Languages program, which offers a strong foundation in Spanish and English, along with the option to study additional foreign languages such as German, French, Italian, or Portuguese. The program also allows students to choose from three different areas of emphasis: translation skills, digital communication, or organizational communication. I genuinely enjoy studying at Ean University. It equips students with essential tools for entering the labor market. Even as a student in the Faculty of Humanities, I am required to learn about business and economic strategies—something I find particularly valuable for those who aspire to go beyond language learning and theoretical knowledge. Another aspect I appreciate is how the university supports students in developing their start-up ideas, regardless of whether those ventures are currently successful or still in the early stages. Although the campus is relatively small, it is well-equipped. The classrooms are spacious and offer a variety of useful resources. There are also several social spaces for students to enjoy, including a nap room, a game room, limited green areas, and more. Additionally, the university is located in one of the best areas of the city, surrounded by restaurants, shopping malls, and countless activities—making student life both convenient and vibrant. In my experience, the professors have been excellent—knowledgeable, respectful, and supportive. However, I’m aware that some of my peers have had less positive interactions. That said, not everything has been perfect. The course registration process can vary between being highly efficient and extremely chaotic. I’ve had instances where I had to argue with administrative staff just to complete a simple request, which often took a long time to resolve. Additionally, many students (though not myself) have raised concerns about the curriculum including courses that don’t seem essential to our field—such as statistics, multiple entrepreneurship classes, and geopolitical studies. Overall, my experience at Ean University has been very positive, though there is definitely room for improvement, particularly in administrative processes.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show