Universidad Nacional de Colombia vs Universidad del Rosario - UROSARIO vs Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG vs Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO vs Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC
Side-by-side comparison from 80 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High academic quality and knowledgeable professors.
- +Personal and professional growth opportunities.
- +Positive and supportive campus environment.
- +Innovative programs with practical application and real-world projects
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors dedicated to student growth
- +Comprehensive and ethical education fostering personal and professional development
- +Excellent faculty and academic level
- +Relevant and practical learning experiences
- +Attractive and accessible campus locations
- +Accessible and opportunity-focused education for diverse backgrounds
- +Engaging and interactive learning with skilled, supportive professors
- +Practical programs promoting personal and professional growth
- +Strong social and community focus
- +Early patient contact and practical skill development
- +Student voice and equitable treatment
- +Supportive and high-quality teaching
- +Ample green campus spaces
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Inconsistent course quality and teaching standards are a common complaint.
- -Inefficient administrative and communication issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor quality of teaching and curriculum development is a significant concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.
- -Poor syllabus quality and outdated academic programs are disappointing.
- -There are significant administrative and management issues present.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major concern.
- -Communication and organization are frequently criticized as poor.
- -Outdated curriculum and lack of focus on professional development.
- -Poor administrative and management practices.
- -Limited international opportunities and low university ranking.
Nothing to show
This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly for its Location and Student Life, both approaching a perfect score. Professors also receive near-perfect ratings. While Internationality and Value are strong, Facilities are rated moderately well. The weakest area, however, is Accomodation, indicating a need for improvement in this category.
An overview of the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. Professors and student life emerge as the strongest areas, both receiving high marks. Internationality and value are also rated very favorably. Facilities, location, and accommodation, while still respectable, represent the weaker aspects of the university's offerings, scoring lower than other categories.
This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.
This institution shines particularly in its value for money, boasting a 4.5 rating. Facilities and student life also received strong marks at 4.2, closely followed by professors at 4.17. However, accommodation and internationality represent areas for potential improvement, both scoring a 3. Location, while decent at 3.8, is not a standout feature compared to the university's strengths.
Overall, the university receives commendable ratings. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Professors, both scoring 4.5 and 4.625 respectively, closely followed by Location and Value. Student Life and Accomodation are rated well at 4. The university's weakest area is Internationality, with a score of 3.875, though this still indicates a generally positive reception.
This institution demonstrates exceptional performance across all surveyed categories, receiving a perfect score of 1 in every aspect. Consequently, there are no distinct strongest or weakest areas, as the university excels uniformly in its facilities, professor quality, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. This indicates a remarkably consistent and high-achieving environment.
Nothing to show
With a 4.75/5 average, ~100% of 32 reviews are positive. Students praise excellent academic quality, highly qualified professors, and a supportive, professional environment. No negative feedback was recorded.
With ~100% positive feedback and an average of 4.54/5 stars, reviews highlight an innovative and comprehensive education. Students appreciate knowledgeable professors, practical projects, and opportunities for growth and international experiences.
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.
With 5 positive reviews (~63%) and 1 negative (~12.5%), students highlight accessible education and practical programs. Some appreciate teacher quality and learning technology, while one found syllabus issues in a specific program.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight meaningful experiences, practical patient contact, and a strong social focus. Some mention timetable distribution issues.
With a 2.5/5 average rating, reviews are split evenly, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative feedback. Positive comments highlight green spaces and satisfactory teaching quality. Negative reviews criticize obsolete curriculum, focus on money, and lack of international agreements or research promotion.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Do not study here, there are other better universities. The pensum are obsolete. The university is only interested in money. There are no international agreements, they do not have a good ranking, they do not promote research or culture of professional development
Nothing to show