Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO vs Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP vs Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC vs Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca - UCMC vs Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC

Side-by-side comparison from 26 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO: wins 3/6 categories
Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca - UCMC: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC: wins 2/6 categories
Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO: wins 1/6 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: BSC Medical Laboratory Technology
Best programme: General Medicine
Best programme: Architecture
Category ratings
Facilities
4.43
Not rated
4.20
3.00
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.57
Win
Not rated
3.40
Not rated
4.50
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.57
Not rated
4.60
5.00
4.63
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.29
Not rated
3.20
2.00
3.88
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.71
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.43
Not rated
4.40
4.00
4.63
Win
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.71
Win
Not rated
3.60
3.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, experienced faculty
  • +Strong, well-structured programs with practical application
  • +Excellent academic training and professional growth opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Strong economics, law, and political science programs
  • +Excellent preparation for the labor market
  • +University prestige and history
  • +Expert faculty and hands-on learning
  • +Diverse and in-demand programs
  • +Convenient campus access
  • +Strong social and community focus
  • +Early patient contact and practical skill development
  • +Student voice and equitable treatment
  • +Emphasis on fostering individual creative development.
  • +High-quality education and professional training across diverse fields.
  • +Focus on personal growth and becoming better individuals.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Disorganized and unhelpful administration.
  • -Outdated or insufficient facilities and resources.
  • -Lack of engaging or relevant curriculum.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff creates confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of support and unclear expectations contribute to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major concern.
  • -Communication and organization are frequently criticized as poor.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently cited.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support causes frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this institution garners positive evaluations across numerous aspects. Student life and accommodation stand out as the strongest areas, achieving the highest scores. Conversely, internationality is rated slightly lower than other categories, representing the weakest performing metric. Facilities and value received comparable, solid ratings, while professor and location scores were also very strong.

Nothing to show

Professors receive the highest marks, reflecting a strong academic core. Facilities and value also score well, indicating a positive learning environment and good return on investment. However, location and internationality present opportunities for improvement, with lower scores in these areas. Student life and accommodation fall within the middle range of ratings.

This institution demonstrates a notable strength in the quality of its professors, receiving a perfect score. Conversely, its location received no rating, indicating a potential area for improvement or a lack of data. Other aspects like facilities, student life, and accommodation were moderately rated, suggesting a generally satisfactory experience. Internationality scores were lower, and value for money was rated well.

Overall, the university receives commendable ratings. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Professors, both scoring 4.5 and 4.625 respectively, closely followed by Location and Value. Student Life and Accomodation are rated well at 4. The university's weakest area is Internationality, with a score of 3.875, though this still indicates a generally positive reception.

An impressive showing across several key areas, this institution excels particularly in its **professors and internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at a strong 4 out of 5. The university also scores well for **value**, indicating a positive return for students.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All seven reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise high-quality faculty, excellent curriculum, state-of-the-art facilities, and strong professional training.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.67/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% of feedback is positive. Students praise rigorous economics and law programs, excellent professional preparation, and the university's prestige. No negative feedback was received.

With an average rating of 5/5, all feedback is positive. Students praise the excellent faculty, good clinical sites, and the seamless integration of theory and practice. Accessibility via public transport or car is also highlighted.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight meaningful experiences, practical patient contact, and a strong social focus. Some mention timetable distribution issues.

With an average rating of 5/5 stars, the 2 reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the freedom to explore creative processes and the university's reputation for high-quality education across various fields.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
86%
0%
83%
100%
56%
100%
0%
4★
14%
0%
0%
0%
44%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close