CUNEF vs University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene - USTHB vs University of Limerick - UL vs Centro Universitário de Belo Horizonte - UniBH vs Butler University

Side-by-side comparison from 146 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Kansas State University - K state (4.80)
CUNEF: wins 0/6 categories
University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene - USTHB: wins 0/6 categories
University of Limerick - UL: wins 0/6 categories
Centro Universitário de Belo Horizonte - UniBH: wins 3/6 categories
Butler University: wins 0/6 categories
Kansas State University - K state: wins 0/6 categories
Advantere School of Management: wins 3/6 categories
Comparing
Madrid, Spain
4.50
Read more reviews
11 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: School of Business/Management
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Manhattan, Kansas, United States
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
13 reviews
×
Best programme: Animal Science
Best programme: Master’s in International Management (MIM)
Category ratings
Facilities
3.91
3.60
4.26
4.00
Not rated
4.42
4.69
Win
Location
3.70
4.60
4.27
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.60
4.79
Professors
4.55
3.40
4.28
4.50
Not rated
4.62
4.81
Win
Internationality
4.00
3.60
4.21
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.62
4.59
Student life
4.36
3.80
4.39
4.50
Not rated
4.69
4.77
Win
Value
4.27
4.00
4.32
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.54
4.66
Accommodation
3.60
3.40
4.09
4.50
Not rated
4.50
4.34
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Individualized student support and professor mentorship
  • +Motivating learning environment and diverse course offerings
  • +Welcoming community and enriching student experience
  • +Highly knowledgeable and passionate professors
  • +Large campus with modern facilities and diverse programs
  • +Friendly, collaborative, and supportive student community
  • +Practical skills and career preparation
  • +Supportive and friendly academic staff and community
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Excellent, supportive, and knowledgeable professors
  • +Modern infrastructure and convenient campus locations
  • +Attentive administration and responsive support

Nothing to show

  • +Welcoming campus atmosphere and friendly community
  • +Helpful and engaging professors invested in student success
  • +Opportunities for connection and networking
  • +Practical, project-based learning with real-world application
  • +Strong professional network and career preparation
  • +Supportive faculty and international environment
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources are a major concern.
  • -Inflexible academic policies and unsupportive staff create a negative learning environment.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
  • -Lack of career guidance and irrelevant research suggestions from faculty.
  • -Poor quality of education and facilities not worth the cost.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major drawbacks.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff frustrates students.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Lack of effective communication and transparency from the institution is a recurring complaint.
  • -Poor communication and disorganization from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
  • -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
Rating summary
What students say

Reviewing the provided ratings reveals a university that excels in its academic offerings and student experience. Professors received the highest marks, indicating strong teaching quality, while student life was also highly rated, suggesting a vibrant campus community. Conversely, facilities represent the weakest area, with a comparatively lower score. Location and accommodation also scored moderately, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects of the student environment.

The university shines in its **location**, receiving an outstanding 4.6. Its **value** is also a significant strength, scoring a perfect 4. Conversely, the **professors** and **accommodation** are areas for improvement, both rated at 3.4. Other aspects like facilities and student life fall within a moderate range.

Analysis of university ratings reveals a generally positive reception. The strongest area is **Value** (4.32), closely followed by **Professors** (4.28) and **Student Life** (4.23). **Accommodations** stand out as the weakest point, receiving the lowest rating at 3.94. Other categories like Facilities and Internationality also scored well above average.

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly for its outstanding **location** and **internationality**, both receiving a perfect score. **Professors**, **student life**, **accommodation**, and **value** also stand out with a 4.5 rating. The only area falling slightly below the top tier, though still strong, is **facilities**, rated at 4.

Nothing to show

This institution receives notable praise across multiple aspects. Student life stands out as its strongest area, closely followed by high scores for professors, location, and internationality. Accommodations and value are also rated favorably. The weakest area, though still strong, is facilities.

Remarkable scores are evident across most surveyed aspects of this university. Professors and location stand out as exceptionally strong areas, both scoring near perfect marks. Student life and facilities also received very high praise. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, though it still maintains a respectable rating. Internationality and value for money are also well-regarded.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.45/5 from 11 reviews, ~91% of feedback is positive. Students praise the individual approach, supportive professors, and valuable academic/personal experiences in Madrid. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a high proportion of positive feedback, reviewers describe an enriching and collaborative academic environment. Students appreciate knowledgeable professors, modern facilities, and diverse program options, though some noted unhelpful teachers.

With an average rating of 4.24/5, approximately 99% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent facilities, practical skills, and a vibrant learning atmosphere. A single negative review mentioned concerns about career prospects and faculty motivation.

With a 4.67 average rating, nearly 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise excellent professors, modern infrastructure, and broad spaces. Minor criticisms mention the student access system and slow administrative processes.

Nothing to show

With a high average rating of 4.85/5 from 13 reviews, students praise the welcoming atmosphere, friendly individuals, and helpful professors. Opportunities for connection and engaging academic experiences are also highlighted.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~97% 4-5 stars), highlighting valuable technical knowledge, practical learning, and professional network development. No negative feedback was provided.

Rating distribution
5★
55%
0%
28%
67%
0%
85%
75%
4★
36%
80%
71%
33%
0%
15%
22%
3★
9%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

University Life in Limerick

I am currently studying a Masters in International Entrepreneurship Management this programme develops entrepreneurial creativity, awareness and specialist knowledge to help establish, manage and grow innovative new ventures across a variety of industry settings, incorporating a range of in-company projects to give ‘real world’ experience. Participants explore their own entrepreneurial potential and prepare an investor-ready business plan. I have always wanted to start my own business and this programme equipped me with the tools and skills to do this. Throughout the programme, we were able to work with real-life businesses and consult for them on a regular basis. For example in a module called international business consulting we worked for one of the biggest PPE distributors in the EU. We developed a market entry strategy for the company Irema and outlined how they could advance into the US market. Furthermore, for the final year project, we had to work with a small enterprise and establish a two-year commercialisation plan for them. This was really great fun and gave a practical experience that you wouldn’t be able to get in any other programme.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Masters international Management

I enjoyed this programe, academically is it similar to other programs in other cities but it offers so much more. The personal connection with professors, strong guidance for future career and the international network is what separates it from other options!

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close