Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista - UPSJB vs Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria - UNI vs Universidad Ricardo Palma - URP vs Universidad de San Martín de Porres - USMP vs Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia - UPCH
Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Competitive and improving curriculum
- +Affordable tuition for medical studies
- +Strong academic rigor and critical thinking development
- +Supportive community and positive campus environment
- +Quality infrastructure and experienced faculty
Nothing to show
- +Practical learning experiences and quality study programs
- +Supportive and innovative teaching methods
- +Good infrastructure and administrative support
- +Quality education & skill development
- +Supportive and engaging learning environment
- +Dedicated and skilled professors
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of support and poor communication negatively impact student well-being.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a persistent problem.
Nothing to show
- -Lack of transparency and communication regarding policies, procedures, and academic advising.
- -Inadequate and outdated facilities, including insufficient study spaces and technology.
- -Bureaucratic administrative processes and unresponsive staff.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
Across all surveyed categories, the institution received uniformly neutral ratings of zero. This indicates no particular strengths or weaknesses were identified in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or overall value. The consistent scoring suggests an average or unremarkable performance across every aspect evaluated.
This institution demonstrates a robust offering, with its **Location** standing out as its strongest asset, earning a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, receiving a strong 4.5. Conversely, **Internationality** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, at 3.5. Other aspects like facilities, student life, accommodation, and value all received solid marks in the 4-4.5 range.
Nothing to show
Overall, the university presents a consistent performance across most aspects. Its strongest areas are the quality of its professors and a vibrant student life and international community, both receiving solid 4 and 3.5 ratings respectively. Conversely, facilities and accommodation are identified as areas for improvement, each scoring a 3. The university offers a fair value proposition, also rated at 3.5.
This institution shines particularly bright in **Internationality** and **Value**, earning impressive scores of 4.8 and 4.9 respectively. Conversely, its **Location** and **Student Life** present areas for development, with ratings of 2.9 and 2.8. The university also received solid, albeit less outstanding, marks for its **Facilities** and **Professors** (3.6), and **Accomodation** (2.8).
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Nothing to show
With one review and an average rating of 4/5, feedback is predominantly positive (~100%). The positive review highlights a competitive curriculum and feasible pricing for medicine, while suggesting improvements in infrastructure.
All three reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a high academic level, strong foundational knowledge, and a positive university experience with good facilities and a supportive environment.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight strong communications programs, good study plans, and effective teaching. Areas for improvement include curriculum updates and expanded internship/job placement agreements.
With an average rating of 4/5, positive feedback (~100%) highlights prestigious education, skill development, and supportive professors. No negative feedback was reported.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (UPCH) is a very prestigious university in Peru, since it provides a quality education for all, provides opportunities for all to develop their skills and abilities for their professional life, It provides a pleasant environment to study and dialogue with our colleagues and above all they have professors with vocation. Personally, I am very grateful for the quality teaching that they offer me, since I have been able to develop my potential, abilities, skills and discover hidden talents, which I am very grateful. I recommend everyone to study at this university, as they will obtain a quality education that will be meaningful learning for their professional lives.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
