Russian State Social University - RSSU vs Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia - RUDN vs Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO vs Plekhanov Russian University of Economics vs Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS

Side-by-side comparison from 16 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Russian State Social University - RSSU: wins 0/2 categories
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia - RUDN: wins 0/2 categories
Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO: wins 2/2 categories
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics: wins 0/2 categories
Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS: wins 0/2 categories
Elbrus Coding Bootcamp: wins 0/2 categories
Center for Creative Leadership: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: BA Political Science
Best programme: Accounting and Management
Best programme: Bachelor of Management
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology of Human Resources Development
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.80
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Location
Not rated
4.20
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Professors
Not rated
3.80
5.00
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
Not rated
4.20
5.00
Win
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Student life
Not rated
4.50
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Value
Not rated
4.00
5.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
Not rated
3.20
5.00
Win
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, profound knowledge from competent teachers.
  • +Friendly, calm, and supportive learning atmosphere.
  • +High academic standards and rigorous disciplines.
  • +Engaging academics, practical skill development, and career support
  • +Vibrant, multicultural atmosphere with global connections and cultural exchange
  • +Diverse program options and research opportunities
  • +Engaging, relevant instruction from passionate, supportive faculty.
  • +Emphasis on analytical thinking and practical application of concepts.
  • +Strong marketing and management programs
  • +International opportunities and faculty support
  • +Active student life and modern facilities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Student-centered support and inclusivity
  • +Welcoming and understanding community
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including allegations of corruption and biased treatment.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content can be irrelevant or not up-to-date.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities hinder the learning experience.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often unsatisfactory.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
Rating summary
What students say

Presenting a uniform performance across all assessed aspects, this institution received identical ratings in each category. Consequently, there are no distinct strongest or weakest areas identified. The university demonstrates a consistent, albeit unexceptional, standing in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, with no single area outperforming others.

This institution demonstrates a robust student life, scoring a 4.5, and excellent internationality and location at 4.2. However, accommodation presents the lowest score at 3.2, with facilities and professors also receiving moderate ratings of 3.8. Value is rated a solid 4.0, suggesting a generally positive experience balanced by some areas for improvement.

This institution achieves perfect scores across all assessed areas. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a stellar 5 out of 5. This indicates an exceptionally strong and well-rounded university experience with no discernible weak points based on this rating system.

Boasting excellent scores, the university excels in its facilities, location, and student life, all receiving a perfect five stars. However, areas for improvement are evident in professors, accommodation, and internationality, which all received a rating of approximately 3.67. Value is rated a solid four stars, indicating a generally positive perception of the institution.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All reviews are positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight high academic standards, profound knowledge acquisition, and a friendly, calm atmosphere. They praise teachers as knowledgeable and supportive, recommending the university for quality higher education.

With a 4/5 average rating from 8 reviews, ~75% are positive. Students praise academic exploration, diverse cultures, and career preparation. A small portion (~12.5%) mention administrative delays and corruption allegations.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. The feedback is overwhelmingly positive, highlighting engaging coursework, interactive instructors, and supportive guidance. No negative feedback was received.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students praise the program's deep knowledge, international opportunities, and attentive faculty, alongside an active student life. Some mention intense workload and occasional issues with subject sequencing.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
50%
100%
33%
0%
0%
100%
4★
0%
25%
0%
67%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Massive Corruption

"Based on my experience in the PhD Department of Plastic Surgery at the Russian University of Peoples' Friendship named after Patrice Lumumba, significant allegations of corruption have arisen. Faculty members have repeatedly suggested that PhD students engage third parties to bypass direct scientific interactions in exchange for financial incentives. Despite my diligent efforts, I faced biased exams after refusing to participate in these corrupt practices. Complaints to higher authorities yielded no action, and the review committee failed to impartially assess my claims. Consequently, I was expelled in my third year. Now, I struggle to gain readmission or transfer due to pervasive corruption in the field of plastic surgery. I have provided evidence, including a screenshot of a conversation with my supervisor and an audio recording with the department head. My initial aspirations to contribute to scientific advancement have been shattered by the corruption I encountered, leaving me deeply disillusioned and distressed."

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close