IÉSEG School of Management vs EDHEC Business School vs NEOMA Business School vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Excelia Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 353 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international community and global opportunities
- +Supportive professors and active student associations
- +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
- +Strong alumni network and career services support
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Professional development and career opportunities
- +Strong sense of community and student vibe
- +High-quality, structured, and diversified curriculum
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Engaging, practical, and relevant coursework
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Strong international environment and opportunities
- +Approachable and supportive professors
- +Practical learning and real-world experience
- +International environment and personal development
- +Career advancement and market-relevant skills
- +Competent professors and strong community/family feel
- +Well-designed courses and effective research methods
- -Last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
- -Administrative and management issues are consistently problematic.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
- -Students often feel there is a lack of adequate support and communication.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -A lack of communication and support from the institution is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources often hinder learning.
- -A lack of support and communication from staff is a common complaint.
This university receives high marks across most categories, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.55). **Location** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.25), and **Value** (4.31) also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.78) stands out as the weakest area among the assessed aspects, while **Facilities** (4.09) received a solid, yet comparatively lower, rating.
Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.
The university demonstrates a strong performance in student life, achieving the highest rating. Professors, internationality, and value also received excellent scores. Facilities represent the weakest area, though still receiving a positive rating. The overall profile shows a well-rounded institution with notable strengths in student engagement and academic/global aspects.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
This institution receives high marks for its **Internationality**, scoring a notable 4.57. Student life also garners significant praise, with a rating of 4.37. On the other hand, **Accommodations** present an area for improvement, receiving the lowest score at 3.75. Ratings for facilities, professors, location, and value are all solid, generally falling between 4.03 and 4.30, indicating a generally positive but varied experience for students.
Receiving perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated as outstanding. With a consistent five-star performance across every category, there are no discernible weak areas to highlight. The university demonstrates a uniformly strong offering.
This university garners excellent scores across most metrics, with professors receiving a perfect 5.0, followed closely by internationality at 4.75 and facilities/location at 4.67. Student life and value also score well, above 4.0. The weakest area, accommodation, sits at a respectable 4.0, indicating generally positive feedback across the board.
With a 4.38/5 average, ~99% of reviews are positive, praising interesting classes, international experiences, and practical preparation for work. A minimal 0.8% of feedback is negative, citing some course content and last-minute changes.
With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.
With 16 positive reviews (approximately 76%) and 0 negative reviews, student feedback highlights a well-structured program, professional professors, and ample opportunities for professional development and networking through associations and alumni. The learning experience is generally considered valuable and engaging.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
All 28 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.36/5. Students frequently highlight the international environment, dynamic academic approach, and supportive faculty.
Both reviews are overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. Students praise the program's fulfillment of expectations, approachable professors, practical learning, and strong industry connections. The international environment and focus on personal development are also highlighted.
All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5 out of 5 stars. Students praise strong career outcomes, competent professors, and well-designed courses. Some desire more online engagement and professor guidance.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am a Chinese student and I completed my MBA in Business Engineering at IDRAC Business School and the experience has been excellent. The program fully met my expectations. The professors are very approachable, supportive, and always available. I truly appreciated the strong sense of guidance and personal support throughout the course. Highly recommended!
Nothing to show
