HEC Paris vs EDHEC Business School vs Excelia Business School vs ESSCA School of Management vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris

Side-by-side comparison from 179 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
HEC Paris: wins 3/7 categories
EDHEC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Excelia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
ESSCA School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 1/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 2/7 categories
Ecole des Ponts Business School: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Paris, France
4.10
Read more reviews
31 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
La Rochelle, France
4.10
Read more reviews
51 reviews
×
Best programme: Master of Science (MSc)
Best programme: International Business
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.60
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Best programme: AI in Project Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.18
4.24
4.01
3.86
4.40
Win
3.92
4.33
Location
3.92
3.78
4.22
4.33
4.70
4.93
Win
4.50
Professors
4.01
4.33
3.90
3.95
4.60
4.64
4.80
Win
Internationality
4.44
4.43
4.29
3.86
4.60
4.93
Win
4.60
Student life
4.34
Win
4.15
4.26
4.24
3.90
4.15
4.33
Value
4.34
Win
4.07
3.95
3.77
3.90
4.29
4.00
Accommodation
4.02
Win
3.20
3.52
3.50
3.00
3.62
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academics and practical application from expert faculty
  • +Supportive community and engaging student body
  • +Excellent career preparation and global opportunities
  • +High-quality, practical teaching from experienced professors
  • +Strong industry connections and career support
  • +Valuable alumni network and networking opportunities
  • +High-quality teaching and relevant, practical programs
  • +Strong student support and career development resources
  • +International environment and diverse student body
  • +Supportive and inclusive learning environment
  • +Practical and applied learning methods
  • +Vibrant student life and international opportunities
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
  • +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
  • +Opportunities for personal and career growth
  • +Supportive and organized academic environment
  • +Strong career advancement and market-relevant skills.
  • +High-quality faculty and engaging curriculum.
  • +Welcoming community and supportive staff.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including disorganization and perceived arrogance.
  • -Poor teaching quality, with a lack of encouraging discussion and limited course selection.
  • -Limited career prospects and lack of international recognition.
  • -Steep tuition fees strain financial investment.
  • -Superficial academic content and lack of depth in courses.
  • -Unprofessional training and limited internship/apprenticeship support.
  • -Unprepared and unhelpful professors.
  • -Irrelevant courses and outdated curriculum.
  • -Poor organization and administrative issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
  • -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
  • -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are prevalent.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinder academic progress.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners an exceptional rating for **Internationality** at 4.44. **Student Life** and **Value** also score highly, both around 4.34. Conversely, **Location** received the lowest score at 3.92, indicating it is the relative weakness among the surveyed aspects. Other areas like Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation fall within a strong range of 4.0 to 4.18.

An analysis of university ratings reveals a generally positive reception across key aspects. Internationality stands out as the strongest area, receiving the highest score. Conversely, accommodation was rated lowest among the surveyed categories. Facilities, professors, student life, and value all received solid marks, indicating a well-rounded student experience with areas for potential improvement.

This university demonstrates impressive strengths, particularly in **Internationality** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.26), and **Location** (4.22). Facilities and value also receive solid marks. The weakest area, while still respectable, is **Accomodation** (3.52). Overall, the institution offers a well-rounded experience with distinct advantages in fostering an international and engaging student community.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **location**, scoring an impressive 4.33, and in **student life** at 4.24. Ratings for professors and internationality are also solid. The weakest area appears to be **accommodation**, receiving a score of 3.5. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with room for improvement in specific aspects.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.

This university garners exceptional scores in academic and social aspects, with Professors receiving a near-perfect 4.8 and Internationality a strong 4.6. Facilities and Student Life are also well-regarded at 4.33. Location and Value are solid at 4.5 and 4 respectively. However, Accomodation stands out as a weaker area, scoring a significantly lower 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~74% of 31 reviews are positive, highlighting excellent professors, strong community, and a balance of academics with practical and global opportunities. A small percentage (~6.5%) expressed disappointment with program organization or teaching quality.

~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting outstanding teaching quality, practical courses, and strong corporate/alumni networks for career development. One review expressed concerns about high tuition fees relative to investment.

~94% of 52 reviews are positive, highlighting excellent teaching, professors, and career preparation. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions superficial course coverage and a lack of practical value.

With a 3.91/5 average, ~74% of 22 reviews are positive, praising helpful staff, enjoyable campus life, and practical teaching. Two negative reviews (9.1%) cited unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.

With 100% positive sentiment, student reviews highlight strong career advancement and valuable skills gained. Frequent themes include high-quality courses, competent professors, and practical relevance. Some students desired stronger post-graduation support and a more engaged alumni network.

Rating distribution
5★
35%
39%
31%
27%
60%
71%
40%
4★
45%
52%
57%
50%
40%
21%
60%
3★
13%
9%
8%
14%
0%
0%
0%
2★
3%
2%
4%
5%
0%
7%
0%
1★
3%
0%
2%
5%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Diversity and quality of fellow students

Very international and interesting place to be and opens a lot of opportunities, however the administration is very french and facilities are subpar (gym, classrooms) meaning the academic affairs is pretty much useless and lastly we are graded on a curve which can create a toxic environment because of the competition. With that being said the pros outweighs the cons by far.

Enriching Experience

I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.

Nothing to show

Well-rounded programme

Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

The cultural mix and the great atmosphere.

I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close