Instituto Marítimo Español vs Sumy State University vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM vs Universidad Central de Chile vs Greystone College

Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM (4.70)
Instituto Marítimo Español: wins 0/5 categories
Sumy State University: wins 0/5 categories
MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM: wins 3/5 categories
Universidad Central de Chile: wins 1/5 categories
Greystone College: wins 0/5 categories
Botho University Botswana: wins 0/5 categories
Military Institute of Science and Technology: wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: MBA
Santiago de Chile, Chile
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: School of Law
Montreal, Canada
4.00
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Best programme: Bachelor in Information Science
Best programme: Aeronautical Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.25
5.00
Win
4.00
3.73
4.20
4.00
Location
Not rated
3.75
4.50
5.00
4.45
4.50
5.00
Professors
Not rated
3.25
4.33
4.00
4.33
4.00
3.00
Internationality
Not rated
3.25
4.67
Win
3.00
4.42
3.60
3.00
Student life
Not rated
3.50
4.67
5.00
Win
4.42
4.50
4.00
Value
Not rated
2.75
4.67
Win
3.00
3.92
4.60
3.00
Accommodation
Not rated
2.50
4.67
3.00
3.27
3.50
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Understanding and supportive teachers
  • +Strong academic programs and knowledge acquisition
  • +Positive campus environment and affordability
  • +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
  • +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
  • +Real-world application and career preparation
  • +Outstanding faculty and high-quality campuses
  • +Excellent university life and services
  • +Wide range of undergraduate and graduate programs
  • +Effective teaching and supportive professors
  • +Comprehensive programs and extra learning materials
  • +Excellent staff support and professional development preparation
  • +Relevant and updated programs
  • +Freshman friendly administration
  • +Focus on practical learning
  • +strong academics and excellent labs
  • +well-structured curriculum for theory and practice
  • +no session jams, timely graduation
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Insufficient practical training and overwhelming theory.
  • -Irrelevant or excessive coursework, including unnecessary national language and history.
  • -Poor communication, administrative issues, and perceived financial exploitation.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a common complaint.
  • -Disorganized program and entry-level content.
  • -Low academic rigor and lack of depth.
  • -Basic English level not ideal for advanced learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact the learning experience.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and uninspired course content are often criticized.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Considering a university's strengths and weaknesses, location stands out as a particularly strong aspect, receiving a high rating. Conversely, accommodation appears to be the weakest area, with a significantly lower score. Other aspects such as facilities, professors, student life, and internationality fall within a moderate range, indicating a balanced performance across these categories.

This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.

This institution excels in areas such as **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving a perfect score of 5. However, it faces challenges in **Accommodations**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, which are rated a moderate 3. The **Facilities** and **Professors** also maintain a solid standing with a rating of 4.

This university garners top marks in several key areas, notably **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving scores above 4.4. **Internationality** also scores very highly. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest aspect, with a rating of just over 3.2. **Facilities** also fall on the lower end of the spectrum compared to other metrics. **Professors** are well-regarded, and **Value** is rated reasonably well.

This institution garners impressive marks, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Student Life**, both scoring a high 4.5. The **Value** for money also stands out at 4.6. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area with a rating of 3.5, followed by **Internationality** at 3.6. Other categories like Facilities (4.2) and Professors (4) received solid, positive reviews.

This institution excels in its **location** and **accommodation**, both receiving perfect scores. **Facilities** and **student life** also score well, indicating a supportive and well-equipped campus environment. However, **professors**, **internationality**, and **value** received average ratings, suggesting potential areas for development compared to its other strengths.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

~67% of reviews are positive, praising understanding teachers and good learning experiences. ~33% are negative, citing insufficient practical training and irrelevant coursework.

Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.

With a 4/5 average rating, this university is praised for its outstanding faculty, quality campuses, and convenient transportation. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights its strong academic offerings and university life.

Most students praise the enriching teaching, supportive staff, and comprehensive programs. Positive experiences highlight helpful professors and professional development. A small fraction found the program to be entry-level and lacking organization.

Three out of five reviews are positive, reflecting an average rating of 3.8/5. Students praise the freshman-friendly administration and relevant, updated programs, particularly in tech fields like Cybersecurity. Limited practical resources were a minor concern.

With an average rating of 4/5 from one review, the Military Institute of Science and Technology (MIST) is praised for its strong academic environment and excellent lab facilities. Students appreciate the well-structured curriculum and the absence of session jams, allowing for timely graduation.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
33%
67%
0%
33%
20%
0%
4★
0%
33%
33%
100%
42%
40%
100%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
17%
40%
0%
2★
0%
33%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

My Greystone college's experience

I attended Greystone college in Vancouver and now I am searching for my coop work experience. The professors were knowledgeable and passionate about their subjects, and the classes were challenging but also engaging. One of the positive things is that in addition to learning updated topics, you also meet people from different parts of the world. Also there are plenty of extracurricular activities to get involved in as a volunteer, and they also hold job fairs for students to contact companies in the field. Finally, one of the things I would like them to improve is the the curriculum preparation workshops, where they should mention more the reality and difficulties of the market when looking for work. I would definitely recommend this college to anyone looking for a quality education in a supportive environment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close