Westminster International University in Tashkent - WIUT vs Tashkent Financial Institute - TFI vs The Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas - RGU vs National University of Uzbekistan vs Tashkent University of Information Technologies - TUIT

Side-by-side comparison from 44 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Inha University in Tashkent - IUT (4.20)
Westminster International University in Tashkent - WIUT: wins 3/7 categories
Tashkent Financial Institute - TFI: wins 0/7 categories
The Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas - RGU: wins 0/7 categories
National University of Uzbekistan: wins 0/7 categories
Tashkent University of Information Technologies - TUIT: wins 0/7 categories
Inha University in Tashkent - IUT: wins 4/7 categories
New Uzbekistan University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Management
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Information Engineering
Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.03
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.80
Not rated
Location
4.25
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.40
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.22
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.60
Win
Not rated
Internationality
3.03
Win
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.00
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.20
Win
Not rated
Value
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.20
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.56
Win
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.40
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent academic quality and support services.
  • +Broad opportunities and vibrant student life.
  • +Accessible tuition and financial aid options.
  • +High-quality education in core subjects
  • +Accessible and knowledgeable teachers
  • +Good range of specializations

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Quality education & international recognition
  • +Supportive faculty & engaging campus life
  • +Diverse academic programs & career focus

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevant coursework is a common complaint.
  • -Strict rules and mandatory attendance are disliked.
  • -Inconsistent teacher qualifications lead to boring lessons.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are major concerns.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty and administration are prevalent.
  • -Inflexible policies and administrative burdens create significant frustration.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

The university demonstrates strong performance in key areas, notably excelling in **Location** and **Professors**, both receiving scores above 4.2. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also hold solid ratings around 4.0. However, areas for potential improvement include **Internationality** and **Accomodation**, which scored significantly lower at approximately 3.0 and 3.6, respectively. **Value** is rated a respectable 4.0.

This institution presents a moderate overall profile, with facilities, professors, location, and value all receiving a rating of 3. Student life and accommodation are notable weaker points, both scoring a 2. The university's internationality stands out as its lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 1.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution excels in teaching quality, with professors earning a remarkable 4.6 rating, and also scores highly for its convenient location (4.4) and vibrant student life (4.2). However, accommodation and internationality present areas for improvement, receiving scores of 3.4 and 3.0 respectively. Facilities also fall slightly behind, rated at 3.8, while value for money is well-received at 4.2.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~100% positive feedback and an average rating of 3.94/5, students highlight smooth enrollment, reasonable tuition, and excellent academic and social support. Opportunities for development and accessibility through aid are frequently praised.

Most students (around 75%) report positive experiences, praising good teaching quality and relevant subject knowledge. Around 25% note some issues with curriculum including unnecessary subjects and inconsistent teacher qualification.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

All five reviews are positive, averaging 4.2 stars. Students praise the university's strong academic programs, international recognition, and supportive faculty. The vibrant campus life and friendly student community are also highlighted.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
14%
25%
0%
0%
0%
20%
0%
4★
66%
50%
0%
0%
0%
80%
0%
3★
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Honest opinion

My university is one of the developed in the country. It has several different faculties which are popular among students in my homeland. The university itself tries to make students life full of emotions and the contribution of students union is enormous. The studying process is quite hard, nevertheless, the help of staff make it somehow easy. However, one improvement which I can suggest is differentiating seminars. Because at times they are interesting at times no. But also it depends from the tutor. I suggest to look through this issue and work on it.

Overview

Well my university stands in third top university in Uzbekistan but rules here are very straight. Even we have to wear uniforms everyday and we have to attend every class. Some of the teachers are qualified but others are not. This makes the lessons boring...

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close