Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman vs National Aviation University vs National Technical University of Ukraine Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute - NTUU KPI vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM vs Kyiv National Linguistic University
Side-by-side comparison from 16 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and supportive faculty.
- +Positive student atmosphere and community.
- +Opportunities for practical experience and international exchange.
- +Excellent faculty and engaging teaching methods
- +Valuable practical experience and career preparation
- +Supportive learning environment and strong community
- +Strong technical foundation and useful experience
- +Cool community and interesting social life
- +Intense but manageable workload
- +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
- +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
- +Real-world application and career preparation
- +Strong business and language programmes
- +Effective learning and task completion
- +Positive learning experience
Nothing to show
- +Affordable quality education
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Practical, well-structured curriculum
- -Pervasive corruption and a focus on extracting money.
- -Inadequate and unengaging teaching from unmotivated lecturers.
- -Wasted time with little real value gained.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor English proficiency among professors.
- -Administrative and management indifference to student well-being.
- -Outdated facilities and ongoing maintenance problems.
- -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
- -Administrative & management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are frustrating.
- -Poor communication and a lack of support create a negative experience.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
- -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support creates frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication regarding policies and opportunities is common.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in **Student Life**, receiving a high rating of 4.5. **Location** and **Professors** are also well-regarded, both scoring 4. **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.5. **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall within the mid-range of scores.
This institution's ratings present a mixed picture. Its strongest points are location, earning a respectable 3, suggesting good accessibility and surroundings. However, areas such as accommodation, professors, facilities, student life, and internationality all received a 2, indicating a need for significant improvement in these crucial aspects of the student experience. The value also received a 2, reflecting concerns about the return on investment.
Analysis of this university's ratings reveals strengths in its **Location (4.5)**, standing out significantly. Conversely, the weakest areas appear to be **Professors (2)** and **Accomodation (2.5)**, both receiving considerably lower scores. Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately at 3, while Internationality and Value fall within the lower-average range.
This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.
Regarding university performance, the location received a perfect score, standing out as its strongest attribute. Conversely, accommodation was rated the lowest. Professors, student life, internationality, and value all garnered solid ratings, reflecting well on these aspects. Facilities also received a respectable, though mid-range, score.
Nothing to show
This institution garners exceptional ratings across most categories, with perfect scores awarded for both **Location** and **Accomodation**. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also received outstanding marks. The **Professors** area, while still strong, is the relatively weakest point at a solid 4 out of 5.
With an average rating of 3.25/5, feedback is split evenly between positive and negative. Students praised good staff and interesting programs, while others cited corruption and unengaging teaching.
The single review indicates a highly negative experience. The reviewer cited old equipment not meeting program needs and professors with poor English proficiency, even in an English-taught program. This represented ~100% of feedback, resulting in a 1/5 average rating.
With an average rating of 3.33/5, approximately 67% of reviews are positive, highlighting a cool community, useful experience, and strong technical foundation. Some negative feedback (33.3%) mentions areas for improvement such as building repairs and heating issues.
Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.
Two out of three reviews are positive, contributing to an average rating of 4/5. Students praise the learning experience and curriculum, with minimal negative feedback.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive. Reviews highlight affordable education and a solid curriculum with a good balance of theory and practical experience. Faculty are described as knowledgeable and supportive.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Kyiv Medical University offers a solid educational foundation for aspiring healthcare professionals. The faculty is knowledgeable and supportive, providing valuable insights and guidance throughout the program. The curriculum is well-structured, combining theoretical knowledge with practical experience, which is essential for our future careers. Opinion: Overall, my experience at Kyiv Medical University has been positive. I appreciate the emphasis on hands-on training and the opportunities to interact with patients early in our studies. The campus environment is vibrant and fosters a sense of community among students. However, I feel that there could be improvements in certain administrative processes, which can sometimes be slow and cumbersome. Recommendation: I would recommend Kyiv Medical University to those looking to pursue a medical career, as it equips students with the necessary skills and knowledge. The supportive atmosphere and strong academic foundation make it a worthwhile choice for anyone passionate about healthcare.