National Pedagogical Dragomanov University vs Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman vs National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM vs Bogomolets National Medical University - NMU

Side-by-side comparison from 13 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
National Pedagogical Dragomanov University: wins 0/3 categories
Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman: wins 0/3 categories
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine: wins 0/3 categories
MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM: wins 0/3 categories
Bogomolets National Medical University - NMU: wins 0/3 categories
GoIT Neoversity: wins 0/3 categories
International University of Finance - IUF: wins 3/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Biology and Wildlife
Best programme: MBA
Kiev, Ukraine
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.00
4.00
5.00
2.00
Not rated
5.00
Location
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.50
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
Not rated
4.00
5.00
4.33
2.33
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
Not rated
3.00
4.00
4.67
2.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
Not rated
4.50
5.00
4.67
3.33
Not rated
5.00
Value
Not rated
3.50
5.00
4.67
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
Not rated
2.50
4.00
4.67
2.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Positive atmosphere and friendly teachers
  • +Beautiful and quiet campus
  • +Supportive and manageable academic environment
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive faculty.
  • +Positive student atmosphere and community.
  • +Opportunities for practical experience and international exchange.
  • +Welcoming and inclusive environment
  • +Positive learning atmosphere
  • +Well-maintained campus
  • +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
  • +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
  • +Real-world application and career preparation
  • +Expert instructors and engaging teaching methods.
  • +Relevant and practical curriculum with up-to-date content.
  • +Supportive learning environment and strong career services.

Nothing to show

  • +Strong campus atmosphere and good friendships
  • +Nice and approachable teachers
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Pervasive corruption and a focus on extracting money.
  • -Inadequate and unengaging teaching from unmotivated lecturers.
  • -Wasted time with little real value gained.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is frequently mentioned.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
  • -Excessive workload and focus on written assignments over practical skills.
  • -Ineffective and demanding remote learning practices.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are consistently frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of communication and support from staff is a major concern.
Rating summary
What students say

This university exhibits a uniformly unimpressive profile, with zero ratings across all evaluated aspects. Consequently, no specific areas stand out as either strong or weak. The institution scores equally low in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value, suggesting a pervasive need for improvement in all these domains.

This institution demonstrates particular strengths in **Student Life**, receiving a high rating of 4.5. **Location** and **Professors** are also well-regarded, both scoring 4. **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.5. **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall within the mid-range of scores.

This institution shines brightly in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its professors and student life, along with excellent value. Facilities and accommodation also receive strong marks. A notable weakness, however, is its location, which received a zero rating. Internationality is also rated well, indicating a globally aware environment.

This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.

This institution demonstrates a strong showing in its location, which received the highest rating. Conversely, its facilities are the weakest point, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Student life and value also received favorable marks, while professors, accommodation, and internationality fall in the middle range.

Nothing to show

Consistently scoring a perfect 5 across all metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength in every surveyed area. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated outstandingly. There are no discernible weak areas, as the university achieves top marks uniformly. This indicates a uniformly excellent and well-rounded educational experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the university is described as beautiful, quiet, and having a fine atmosphere. Students found exams easy, teachers lighthearted, and facilities bright.

With an average rating of 3.25/5, feedback is split evenly between positive and negative. Students praised good staff and interesting programs, while others cited corruption and unengaging teaching.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. The single review highlights its welcoming atmosphere, neat campus, and calming environment conducive to learning.

Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 2/5, two out of three reviews are negative (~67%). Students report excessive assignments and a focus on online tasks over practical learning.

Nothing to show

The single review is highly positive, rating the university 5/5. The student enjoyed the atmosphere and appreciated the nice teachers, strongly recommending it.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
25%
100%
67%
0%
0%
100%
4★
0%
25%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
2★
0%
50%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Typical Post-Soviet medical university

A certain hierarchy reigns in the university in which professors and the dean’s office are considered gods, and students and laboratory assistants are secondary characters. Despite this, there are people that ready to teach and help you I consider the opportunity to become more independent as a plus in NMU. Many faculties and campuses can also be attributed to the merits of university. The complexity of learning unites students so that you can turn a blind eye to shortcomings…

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close