The John Naisbitt University vs Singidunum University - UPIS vs University of Arts in Belgrade vs University of Defence - UO vs MEF Faculty - Nz
Side-by-side comparison from 16 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical experience through internships
- +Engaging lectures and seminars
- +Supportive faculty and professors
- +Strong theoretical and practical knowledge acquisition.
- +Dynamic and engaging academic atmosphere with a supportive community.
- +Career-focused learning opportunities and approachable professors.
- +Quality courses and dedicated, inspiring professors
- +Opportunities for academic and personal growth
- +Practical application of knowledge and industry connections
- +Quality of teaching and research support
- +Opportunities for professional development and research involvement
- +Institutional commitment to advancing higher education standards
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Declining academic quality and poor career prospects.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Many find the facilities outdated and lacking in technology.
- -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Excessive administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities negatively impacted the learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support left students feeling unsupported.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources impede learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Across all surveyed categories, the university received a uniform rating of zero. This indicates that all aspects, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, are performing at the lowest possible level. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses, as all areas present an equal and concerning lack of positive performance.
Offering a generally positive assessment, the university excels particularly in its **professors** and **location**, both scoring a high 4.43. Areas such as **facilities**, **student life**, **accommodation**, and **value** also received strong ratings, clustering around 4.14. The lowest score, though still respectable at 4.0, is for **internationality**.
This institution achieves near-perfect scores across several key areas. Facilities, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. Professors also receive a commendable rating of 4.67. The strongest areas are clearly those facilities, student experience, and practical aspects of attending, with the academic staff representing the sole area below a perfect score.
This university presents a uniform picture across all surveyed categories, with no specific areas standing out as particularly strong or weak. Ratings are consistently zero for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates an absence of positive or negative feedback in these key university aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
One positive review highlights practical experience and internships, while one negative review points to declining lecture quality and perceived poor graduate employability. Sentiment is split, with approximately 50% of feedback being negative.
Approximately 89% of reviews are highly positive (4–5 stars), highlighting strong theoretical/practical knowledge and engaging academic environments. No negative reviews were provided.
Students praise the outstanding quality of courses, inspiring faculty, and supportive learning environment. Practical and theoretical curriculum, along with opportunities to connect with professionals, are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was reported.
With one review averaging 5/5 stars, ~100% of feedback is positive. The single positive review highlights the university's integrated approach to improving higher education and fostering research.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Back then (in my student days) John Naisbitt University was Megatrend University. I graduated from Faculty of business studies and as years were passing by I realized that quality of lectures, seminars and exams significantly dropped off, to the point where I was aware that it is going to be really difficult to continue with a career. Nowadays employers skip most of CVs with John Naisbitt graduates because they know that quality of their knowledge is weak and working habits are bad. For instance, 8 out of 10 John Naisbitt graduates, including myself got their internship/job because of their relatives, cousins or even friends with influence. Unfortunately, this is the way things are going in Serbia. I would highly recommend for fresh students to skip John Naisbitt University because private universities in Serbia are not being controlled by the government and their goal is just to "produce" graduates. However, faculties of the Belgrade University and the University of Novi Sad give really strong basis to graduates and employers around the world know that these students got their marks by hard work and commitment.
I love being around open-minded people which this university really has. I think that the best thing about this program is that it teaches you everything that you need in your career and gives you the opportunity right after you finish it.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show