Universidad Tecnológica del Perú - UTP vs Universidad de Piura - UDEP vs Universidad Ricardo Palma - URP vs Universidad del Pacífico - UP vs Universidad de San Martín de Porres - USMP
Side-by-side comparison from 9 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent technology and didactic teaching
- +Strong focus on professional and personal development
- +Positive peer relationships
- +Strong academic training with emphasis on values and ethics.
- +Welcoming and peaceful campus environment fostering nature and connection.
- +Inclusive community with diverse backgrounds and humanistic approach.
Nothing to show
- +Academic excellence and international recognition
- +Highly qualified professors with real-world experience
- +Practical learning experiences and quality study programs
- +Supportive and innovative teaching methods
- +Good infrastructure and administrative support
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are major concerns.
- -Lack of responsive and helpful administrative support.
- -Inadequate and outdated campus facilities.
- -Unclear or inconsistent communication from faculty and administration.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a major concern.
- -Communication and administrative issues often cause frustration.
- -Lack of student support and unclear academic expectations are prevalent complaints.
- -Lack of transparency and communication regarding policies, procedures, and academic advising.
- -Inadequate and outdated facilities, including insufficient study spaces and technology.
- -Bureaucratic administrative processes and unresponsive staff.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution garners top marks across all evaluated aspects, achieving a perfect score of 5 in every category. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated exceptionally high. There are no apparent weaknesses, with the university demonstrating outstanding performance uniformly.
An impressive overall assessment reveals a university excelling across many facets. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation all received perfect scores, indicating exceptional strengths in these core areas. The university also demonstrated solid value. However, its internationality score of 3.5 suggests this aspect could benefit from further development.
Nothing to show
This institution presents a uniformly low rating across all assessed aspects, with no individual category demonstrating any particular strength. Areas including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received the lowest possible score, indicating a significant need for improvement in every dimension.
Overall, the university presents a consistent performance across most aspects. Its strongest areas are the quality of its professors and a vibrant student life and international community, both receiving solid 4 and 3.5 ratings respectively. Conversely, facilities and accommodation are identified as areas for improvement, each scoring a 3. The university offers a fair value proposition, also rated at 3.5.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students highlight professional development and excellent laboratory technology. Clear and didactic teaching from professors is also a recurring theme.
All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise the integral training, high academic standards, and diverse extracurricular clubs. The peaceful, nature-filled campus and humanistic approach are also highlighted.
Nothing to show
The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 rating. Universidad del Pacifico is praised for academic excellence and highly qualified professors. No negative feedback was provided.
With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight strong communications programs, good study plans, and effective teaching. Areas for improvement include curriculum updates and expanded internship/job placement agreements.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show