Universidad La Paz vs Universidad Nacional del Este - UNE vs Universidad Privada del Este - UPE vs Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal vs Federal University of Santa Catarina - UFSC

Side-by-side comparison from 16 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Federal University of Santa Catarina - UFSC (4.80)
Universidad La Paz: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Nacional del Este - UNE: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Privada del Este - UPE: wins 0/7 categories
Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal: wins 2/7 categories
Federal University of Santa Catarina - UFSC: wins 5/7 categories
Achievers University - AUO: wins 0/7 categories
Harran University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Ciudad del Este, Paraguay
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Ciudad del Este, Paraguay
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Biomedical Management
Best programme: Applied Foreign Languages
Best programme: Biomedical Engineering
urfa, Turkey
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Win
2.67
Not rated
Location
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
3.50
4.70
Win
3.00
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.00
3.33
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
3.50
3.70
Win
3.67
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
3.50
4.90
Win
3.50
Not rated
Value
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.00
4.80
Win
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Win
2.78
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Helpful and kind teachers
  • +Good quality teaching and course materials
  • +Large space with diverse schools
  • +Highly skilled and approachable faculty.
  • +Strong academic foundation and enriching curriculum.
  • +Excellent campus structure and practical learning opportunities.
  • +Engaging academics with close lecturer-student interaction
  • +Safe environment with extracurricular opportunities
  • +Strong emphasis on discipline and character development

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor technology are frequent complaints.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework is a significant concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent concerns.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff, with professors receiving a high rating of 4.5. Accommodation also scores well at 4. Conversely, facilities represent the weakest area, rated at 3. Other aspects like location, student life, internationality, and value fall within a moderate to good range, generally between 3.5 and 4.

This institution excels in student life, boasting a near-perfect score of 4.9, and also receives excellent feedback for its location and value. Conversely, accommodation presents the most significant challenge, with a substantially lower rating. Ratings for facilities, professors, and internationality fall within a solid, mid-range.

This university's value for money is a standout strength, earning a perfect 4. Internationality and student life also received positive marks, both above 3.5. Conversely, the facilities are a clear area for improvement, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Professors and accommodation are rated moderately.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5 based on two reviews, student feedback is ~100% positive. Students highlight helpful teachers and good course materials. Minor areas for improvement include facilities and HVAC maintenance.

All 10 reviews are positive, averaging 4.8 stars. Students praise highly skilled faculty, a stimulating learning environment, and a strong academic foundation. The campus structure is also noted as aesthetically pleasing and functional.

With an average rating of 3.67/5 from 3 reviews, ~67% are positive. Students highlight growth, academic improvement, and a great learning experience with engaging lecturers and opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
0%
0%
80%
0%
0%
4★
0%
0%
0%
100%
20%
67%
0%
3★
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close