Universidad Interamericana para el Desarrollo - UNID vs Universidad La Paz vs Universidad Nacional del Este - UNE vs Universidad Privada del Este - UPE vs Technical University of Sofia – Branch Plovdiv

Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Interamericana para el Desarrollo - UNID: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad La Paz: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Nacional del Este - UNE: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Privada del Este - UPE: wins 0/5 categories
Technical University of Sofia – Branch Plovdiv: wins 0/5 categories
Kebbi State University of Science and Technology - KSUSTA: wins 1/5 categories
Johnson and Wales University - JWU: wins 4/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Ciudad del Este, Paraguay
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Ciudad del Este, Paraguay
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Education Sciences
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Criminology
Category ratings
Facilities
3.55
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
4.00
Win
Location
3.50
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
4.00
Win
Professors
3.10
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Internationality
2.08
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Win
Student life
2.88
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.00
Value
3.14
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
2.13
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Personalized attention and accessible learning environment
  • +High quality teaching from knowledgeable and supportive professors
  • +Innovative programs and focus on student development

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Technical subject breadth, though some content is outdated.
  • +Limited resources and outdated labs hinder scientific pursuits.
  • +Supportive lecturers and academic environment
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and success
  • +Positive campus community and student integration
  • +Diverse and engaging career-focused programs
  • +Early access to major-specific coursework
  • +Global and diverse student community
Cons
  • -Poor academic quality and lack of support from staff.
  • -Unrealistic expectations and inconsiderate policies for students.
  • -Lack of professionalism and knowledge from some teachers.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Ineffective administrative and management support.
  • -Lack of engagement and relevance in curriculum.
  • -Inconsistent or poor administrative and management support is a major concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from the institution causes frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
Rating summary
What students say

Analysis of these university ratings reveals a mixed picture. The strongest areas include **Facilities**, scoring 3.55, and **Location** at 3.5. **Professors** and **Value** also received respectable scores around 3.1. Conversely, **Accomodation** (2.125) and **Internationality** (2.08) present the most significant areas for improvement, alongside **Student Life** at 2.875.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Across the surveyed categories, the university received uniformly low ratings. With zero marks in all areas, there are no standout strengths to highlight. The institution's performance is consistently weak across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. This suggests a need for significant improvement across all aspects of the university experience.

Student feedback reveals a university with considerable strengths, particularly in **Student Life**, which scored an impressive 4.5. **Professors** also received a solid rating of 4. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Location** garnered a respectable 3.5. The most modest scores were for **Accomodation** (3) and **Internationality** (3). **Value** for money was rated positively at 4.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength across all evaluated aspects, receiving a perfect score of 4 in every category. With uniform high marks for its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, there are no particular areas that stand out as significantly weaker or stronger than others. The university presents a consistently excellent profile for prospective students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~74% of students provide positive feedback, praising personalized attention and good teachers. However, ~28.6% of feedback expresses concerns about slow administration and inconsistent teacher quality.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With one review, the university is rated 4/5 stars. This student highlighted the broad technical knowledge offered but noted limitations for aspiring scientists due to financing and outdated subjects.

With a 3.5/5 average rating, ~50% of reviews are positive. Positive feedback highlights helpful lecturers and a conducive study environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4/5, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students appreciate the diverse career paths offered and the unique "reverse curriculum" structure that allows for early major-specific coursework.

Rating distribution
5★
57%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
14%
0%
0%
0%
100%
50%
100%
3★
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
50%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Worst option, awful professors and service

If you are thinking about signing up here, I recommend that you better look for a serious university and not a duckling like this one. I tell you my experience: Of the teachers I had since the first semester, I can tell you that 3 are salvable, from then on the others leave much to be desired, from lack of professionalism to lack of knowledge about the subject they "taught". They are excellent collectors and they worry a lot because you pay in advance. They send you emails, SMS, WhatsApp, but when it comes to important information, like when your group is no longer profitable and you will have to take classes if you want with another career or to let you know that I do not know who happened to have 5 hours of a subject with only one teacher at a time is a good idea when you have 6 semesters there ... For that there is nothing, no emails, calls, WhatsApp, absolutely nothing. The truth is, if you enter this university, you must be ready to how badly they'll treat you, won't follow up, will make changes without notifying you, won't consult you, will lie constantly and won't look you in the eyes ... The last thing was that I asked for my monthly reimbursement since they never gave us an option that will work for us and that my transcript of matters has no cost to me since they were the ones who did not fulfill their part of the deal and Reyna dares to lie, saying that I would pass my leave, complaint, and request ... It never did, it took 3 weeks without a solution. Today I finally spoke with someone else and I hope to have my leave and papers soon. And if they do not return my money, I hope they ask their God to forgive them for all the ball of lies they say because on earth they are going to turn off. In the end, do not waste your money and time, it's not worth it.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close