National University of Itapúa - UNI vs Universidad Autónoma de Encarnación - UNAE vs Jacksonville University vs University of Massachusetts Amherst - UMass Amherst vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics

Side-by-side comparison from 17 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Hokkaido University (5.00)
National University of Itapúa - UNI: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Encarnación - UNAE: wins 0/7 categories
Jacksonville University: wins 0/7 categories
University of Massachusetts Amherst - UMass Amherst: wins 1/7 categories
NHH Norwegian School of Economics: wins 2/7 categories
Emilio Aguinaldo College-Cavite - EAC-CAVITE: wins 0/7 categories
Hokkaido University: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Amherst, Massachusetts, United States
4.20
Read more reviews
9 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Sapporo, Japan
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: School of Arts and Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.22
4.71
Win
Not rated
4.00
Location
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.44
4.14
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.44
4.43
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.22
4.43
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.78
4.29
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
Win
4.14
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
4.71
Win
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Abundant research and internship opportunities.
  • +Excellent campus facilities and beautiful surroundings.
  • +Vibrant student life and engaging academic programs.
  • +Free tuition and diverse program options
  • +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
  • +Supportive environment and welcoming community

Nothing to show

  • +strong academic reputation in agricultural sciences
  • +youthful and energetic campus atmosphere
  • +enjoyable and meaningful Ph.D. experience
Cons

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of support and communication is a significant concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
  • -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt learning.
  • -Outdated facilities hinder practical training.
  • -Lack of engagement and relevance in curriculum.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution garners strong commendations across several key areas. Student life stands out as its most highly rated aspect, closely followed by accommodation and value. However, facilities and internationality received the lowest scores among the surveyed categories, indicating these might be areas for development. The university also performs well in its professor quality and location.

This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality. Facilities and Accommodations are also well-regarded with a score of 4. The Value metric also received a 4, indicating a positive return on investment. Its weakest areas are its Facilities and Accommodations, both rated at 4 out of 5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 9 reviews, approximately 89% of feedback is positive. Students highlight research opportunities, campus life, and dining options. There are no negative reviews.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.

Nothing to show

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being highly favorable. Students praise its strong agricultural sciences program and energetic yet academic atmosphere. There are no reported negative experiences.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
0%
33%
29%
0%
100%
4★
0%
0%
0%
56%
57%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
11%
14%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close